Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(SILVA-567): fixing label #465

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 13, 2024
Merged

fix(SILVA-567): fixing label #465

merged 2 commits into from
Nov 13, 2024

Conversation

paulushcgcj
Copy link
Contributor

@paulushcgcj paulushcgcj commented Nov 13, 2024

Description

Fixing a misleading label in the advanced search on silviculture

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

Checklist

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING doc
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • Any dependent changes have already been accepted and merged

Further comments


Thanks for the PR!

Any successful deployments (not always required) will be available below.

Backend: https://nr-silva-465-backend.apps.silver.devops.gov.bc.ca/actuator/health
Frontend: https://nr-silva-15-frontend.apps.silver.devops.gov.bc.ca

Once merged, code will be promoted and handed off to following workflow run.
Main Merge Workflow

@paulushcgcj paulushcgcj merged commit 6d5ecce into main Nov 13, 2024
16 of 17 checks passed
@paulushcgcj paulushcgcj deleted the fix/SILVA-567 branch November 13, 2024 21:23
jazzgrewal pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants