-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 45
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
FORMS-1563: auto-approve new ext api when same ministry/url already a… #1543
Open
usingtechnology
wants to merge
9
commits into
bcgov:main
Choose a base branch
from
usingtechnology:feat/FORMS-1563-extapi-preapprove
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+184
−23
Open
Changes from 5 commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
4b6cbe3
FORMS-1563: auto-approve new ext api when same ministry/url already a…
usingtechnology 0b23138
Merge branch 'main' into feat/FORMS-1563-extapi-preapprove
usingtechnology 8e11d2e
Merge branch 'main' into feat/FORMS-1563-extapi-preapprove
usingtechnology 72be127
limit usage of raw sql
usingtechnology e994fec
Merge branch 'main' into feat/FORMS-1563-extapi-preapprove
usingtechnology c2cfaa8
add a sql injection block
usingtechnology d9fda93
Merge branch 'main' into feat/FORMS-1563-extapi-preapprove
usingtechnology d0c9459
Show sendApiKey fo admins before approving an api
usingtechnology de416f4
Merge remote-tracking branch 'refs/remotes/origin/feat/FORMS-1563-ext…
usingtechnology File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There is an SQL injection possible with this raw query. It's convoluted, but unknown if/how a bigger problem could be made:
' OR 'x'='x
, so that the where clause evaluates to true no matter what the ministry isHopefully the admin will notice this:
but perhaps there are ways to obscure it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That would be a bug in form API. And would be a db issue that we have no integrity on that column. So I can "block" that here but that's not where the bugs are. Even worse, Ministry values are frontend only. See: #1188
Adding a bandaid to prevent sql injection in this query, but bugs should be filed and addressed.