Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Security updates #34

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 10, 2024
Merged

Security updates #34

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 10, 2024

Conversation

jatindersingh93
Copy link
Contributor

@jatindersingh93 jatindersingh93 commented Mar 27, 2024

Description

Types of changes

Checklist

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING doc
  • I have checked that unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • I have added necessary documentation (if appropriate)

Further comments

@jatindersingh93 jatindersingh93 force-pushed the SC3520 branch 2 times, most recently from 3c7cdf7 to 98123cd Compare April 4, 2024 00:13
@TimCsaky
Copy link
Contributor

TimCsaky commented Apr 4, 2024

The app seems to be functioning fine on the current deployment from commit 98123cd

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 4, 2024

Coverage Report (Application)

Totals Coverage
Statements: 69.5% ( 180 / 259 )
Methods: 60.61% ( 20 / 33 )
Lines: 75.28% ( 134 / 178 )
Branches: 54.17% ( 26 / 48 )

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 4, 2024

Coverage Report (Frontend)

Totals Coverage
Statements: 28.79% ( 112 / 389 )
Methods: 31.19% ( 34 / 109 )
Lines: 31.91% ( 60 / 188 )
Branches: 19.57% ( 18 / 92 )

@jatindersingh93 jatindersingh93 force-pushed the SC3520 branch 7 times, most recently from dbfbaab to da11092 Compare April 5, 2024 19:33
@jatindersingh93 jatindersingh93 marked this pull request as ready for review April 5, 2024 21:51
@TimCsaky TimCsaky requested review from TimCsaky and norrisng-bc April 5, 2024 22:00
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would be good to indent the first level to show a clearer diff of the packages

@@ -14,15 +14,21 @@
</template>

<script>
// eslint-disable-next-line vue/no-reserved-component-names
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i dont think we need all these instructions telling eslint to ignore in this file.
I had them in the other repo because the components were named Header and Footer which are reserved names.
Where here they are BCGovHeader and BCGovFoter.
Could try removing.

@jatindersingh93 jatindersingh93 force-pushed the SC3520 branch 5 times, most recently from dfd94f0 to 1723b22 Compare April 9, 2024 23:42
@jatindersingh93 jatindersingh93 changed the title Sc3520 Security updates Apr 10, 2024
@TimCsaky TimCsaky merged commit fb76ffe into master Apr 10, 2024
16 of 17 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants