Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: implement report problem feature, revert pn change #2322

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Dec 17, 2024

Conversation

bryce-mcmath
Copy link
Contributor

Leaving in draft until Bifold package deps are ready and updated but it's here if you want to see how the Bifold changes are used. Depends on:

@bryce-mcmath bryce-mcmath added the do not merge This PR is on hold. label Dec 12, 2024
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bryce-mcmath bryce-mcmath left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pre-review to clarify a couple things

@@ -113,7 +114,6 @@ export class AppContainer implements Container {
lokiUrl: Config.REMOTE_LOGGING_URL,
lokiLabels: {
application: getApplicationName().toLowerCase(),
job: 'react-native-logs',
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

job is now specified by the remote logger, if we also specify it here, every job will be the same whether they are incident reports or remote logging sessions. Having separate jobs should allow us to have different lifespans for each job type

@@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ const useInitializeBCAgent = () => {

if (store.preferences.usePushNotifications) {
logger.info('Activating push notifications...')
await activate(newAgent)
activate(newAgent)
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm hoping this reverted line will fix the issue Shel mentioned that happens during SauceLabs app initialization

@bryce-mcmath bryce-mcmath marked this pull request as ready for review December 16, 2024 23:53
Copy link

@al-rosenthal al-rosenthal removed the do not merge This PR is on hold. label Dec 17, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@al-rosenthal al-rosenthal left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🌮

@bryce-mcmath bryce-mcmath merged commit 9de564c into main Dec 17, 2024
16 checks passed
@bryce-mcmath bryce-mcmath deleted the feat/report-a-problem branch December 17, 2024 00:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants