Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PIMS-683 - Geocoder Service #2157

Merged
merged 31 commits into from
Feb 16, 2024
Merged

PIMS-683 - Geocoder Service #2157

merged 31 commits into from
Feb 16, 2024

Conversation

LawrenceLau2020
Copy link
Collaborator

@LawrenceLau2020 LawrenceLau2020 commented Jan 30, 2024

🎯 Summary

PIMS-683:

🔰 Checklist

  • I have read and agree with the following checklist and am following the guidelines in our Code of Conduct document.
  • I have performed a self-review of my code.
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas.
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation where required.
  • I have tested my changes to the best of my ability.
  • My changes generate no new warnings.

Copy link

codeclimate bot commented Feb 16, 2024

Code Climate has analyzed commit c87a5db and detected 0 issues on this pull request.

The test coverage on the diff in this pull request is 89.1% (50% is the threshold).

This pull request will bring the total coverage in the repository to 90.9%.

View more on Code Climate.

Copy link
Collaborator

@dbarkowsky dbarkowsky left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Works great. One commented line that could be removed.
I pushed an update to the .env-template so it would include the geocoder key as a possibility. That file was overdue for an update anyway.

express-api/src/services/geocoder/geocoderService.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@TaylorFries TaylorFries merged commit 4d3375b into main Feb 16, 2024
5 checks passed
@TaylorFries TaylorFries deleted the PIMS-683 branch February 16, 2024 20:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants