-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 90
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Drop the cruft #225
Drop the cruft #225
Conversation
Single class mildly used it. Simple replacement added.
@@ -185,21 +181,21 @@ | |||
<artifactId>maven-dependency-tree</artifactId> | |||
<version>3.2.1</version> | |||
</dependency> | |||
<dependency> | |||
<groupId>org.apache.commons</groupId> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
? really needed? this doesn't look related to the subject of the PR
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
? unsure I get your comment. If you'd look carefully, you will see that I just moved this dependency from last place (as it is non test) to here. I just "moved" it to have proper dep order.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ah right. sorry for that.
aren't we using spotless for pom?
<dependency> | ||
<groupId>commons-io</groupId> | ||
<artifactId>commons-io</artifactId> | ||
<version>2.13.0</version> | ||
<version>2.16.1</version> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this doesn't look related to the subject of the PR
maybe change the subject
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
changed the subject
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
changed the subject
thanks for that. The new subject is really more comprehensive :P
@@ -79,12 +79,11 @@ | |||
</distributionManagement> | |||
|
|||
<properties> | |||
<mavenVersion>3.6.3</mavenVersion> | |||
<mavenVersion>3.9.7</mavenVersion> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this doesn't look related to the subject of the PR
maybe change the subject
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
changed the subject
pom.xml
Outdated
@@ -93,12 +92,12 @@ | |||
<dependency> | |||
<groupId>org.eclipse.sisu</groupId> | |||
<artifactId>org.eclipse.sisu.inject</artifactId> | |||
<version>${sisu.version}</version> | |||
<version>${version.sisu-maven-plugin}</version> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the property name doesn't look related to such library.
I know it's coming from the parent but this is really confusing.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, is ugly, will figure out something. My point was really to not have "disconnected" the sisu version in this plugin vs parent.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Isn't this inherited anyway?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Huh, seems it is, removing whole depMgt section and moving guice version to dep, and that's did it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Lgtm.
@cstamas, sorry, my bad. I merged it instead of only approving it, |
Np, this pr was "complete", so is ok to have it merged |
Drop dependencies that are superfluous (one class used) or are deprecated:
Slight updates and cleanup in dependencies.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MSHADE-473
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MSHADE-474
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MSHADE-475
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MSHADE-476
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MSHADE-477