This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 3, 2023. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 55
ANY23-445 Review spotbugs issues #151
Open
lewismc
wants to merge
7
commits into
apache:master
Choose a base branch
from
lewismc:ANY23-445
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from 5 commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
61d8320
ANY23-445 Review spotbugs issues
lewismc 03aca0a
Merge branch 'master' into ANY23-445
lewismc cde3277
ANY23-445 Review spotbugs issues
lewismc dcef1b4
ANY23-445 Review spotbugs issues
lewismc 842d3f6
ANY23-445 Review spotbugs issues
lewismc ff3ce37
ANY23-445 Review spotbugs issues
lewismc ead2757
ANY23-445 Review spotbugs issues
lewismc File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There's actually a bug here, so adding
@SuppressWarnings
kinda defeats the purpose of the spotbugs plugin.getSupportedMIMETypes()
returns a list ofMIMEType
, so checking if it contains aString
will always return false!There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've removed both the
SupressWarnings
javac annotation and thought about this one again.I've decided to introduce
<omitVisitors>FindUnrelatedTypesInGenericContainer</omitVisitors>
which will omit spotbugs from identifying this issue as a bug. My justification is that, in this case, because theExtractorFactory#getSupportedMIMETypes()
supports wildcards, and as far as I can see there is currently no way to determine the full Collection (e.g.*/*
) of supportedMimeType
's then we cannot enforce another check whether anExtractorGroup
supports allMimeType
's.What do you think about this assessment?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry, I wasn't clear. The code inside this method has a bug, as correctly identified by the spotbugs plugin. The code is testing if a
Collection<MIMEType>
contains aString
. This will always return false, as aString
cannot be an instance ofMIMEType
.Therefore, the method needs to be fixed, and the spotbugs plugin is doing its job correctly: no suppression of warnings is needed here.