Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tool calling support. Part I #102

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

rohitprasad15
Copy link
Collaborator

Add tool calling support for below providers -
OpenAI, Groq, Anthropic, AWS, & Mistral.
OpenAI compatible SDKs need to changes for
tool calling support.

Adding utility ToolManager for users to easily
supply tools, and parse model's request for
tool usage.

Add tool calling support for below providers -
OpenAI, Groq, Anthropic, AWS, & Mistral.
OpenAI compatible SDKs need to changes for
tool calling support.

Adding utility ToolManager for users to easily
supply tools, and parse model's request for
tool usage.
Copy link
Collaborator

@ksolo ksolo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good @rohitprasad15

Nothing blocking, just a few suggestions in the review.

Comment on lines +43 to +45
if isinstance(msg, dict):
return self._convert_dict_message(msg)
return self._convert_message_object(msg)
Copy link
Collaborator

@ksolo ksolo Nov 29, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It looks like both _convert_dict_message and _convert_message_object logically do the same things. Would it be better to convert to one format and keep one of the convert message methods.

if isinstance(msg, dict):
    msg = Message(msg)
return self._convert_message_object(msg)

or the other way

if isinstance(msg, Message):
    msg = dict(msg)
return self._convert_dict_message(msg)

Comment on lines +85 to +103
tool_input = (
tool_call["function"]["arguments"]
if isinstance(tool_call, dict)
else tool_call.function.arguments
)
message_content.append(
{
"type": "tool_use",
"id": (
tool_call["id"] if isinstance(tool_call, dict) else tool_call.id
),
"name": (
tool_call["function"]["name"]
if isinstance(tool_call, dict)
else tool_call.function.name
),
"input": json.loads(tool_input),
}
)
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Similar thought, converting to either an object or dict at the beginning of this would create a consistency that would not require the if/else statements throughout the function call.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you add unit tests for this?

Copy link

@mmtmn mmtmn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

outside of unit tests, lgtm

@amaarora
Copy link

@rohitprasad15 When can we expect tool calling in aisuite? Is there a timeline?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants