Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Release v1.4.0 #606

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Mar 4, 2024
Merged

Release v1.4.0 #606

merged 11 commits into from
Mar 4, 2024

Conversation

kyonRay
Copy link
Contributor

@kyonRay kyonRay commented Mar 2, 2024


name: Default template
about: Default template for pull request
title: '(scope): subject'

标题

不超过80个字符,英文

格式:

<type>(scope): subject

示例:

<feat>(interchain): support inter-chain call from contract

type

type用于说明PR的类别,只允许使用下面的标识

  • feat: 新功能

  • fix: 修复bug

  • perf: 优化相关,比如提升性能、体验

  • test: 增加测试

  • style: 格式(不影响代码运行的变动)

  • refactor: 重构(即不是新增功能,也不是修改bug的代码变动)

  • docs: 文档

  • chore: 构建过程或辅助工具的变动

  • revert: 回滚到上一个版本

  • merge: 代码合并

  • sync: 同步主线或分支的Bug

  • project: 项目配置如readme、changelog(不影响代码)

scope

scope用于说明PR影响的范围,比如交易、事务、资源、网络等等

subject

subject是PR目的的简短描述

kyonRay and others added 11 commits September 7, 2023 12:28
…ipt, add block and tx timestamp. (WeBankBlockchain#588)

* <feat>(rpc): add get block rpc interface.

* <feat>(script): add monitor script.

* <feat>(stub,restserver): add block and tx timestamp.
* <feat>(block): add block transaction details list
<feat>(transactionFetcher): support transaction details list and transaction hash list

* <feat>(block): add block transaction details list
<feat>(transactionFetcher): support transaction details list and transaction hash list

---------

Co-authored-by: lbhan2 <[email protected]>
…nkBlockchain#596)

* Improve the xaTransaction list interface

* feat:add annotation

* feat:Formatted code

* feat:Version changed to 1.0

---------

Co-authored-by: ylxiao5 <[email protected]>
…sion to 1.4.0, update ci to check in jdk 8.0.382. (WeBankBlockchain#600)

* <fix>(script,ci): relax check restriction of openssl version 3.x, version to 1.4.0, update ci to check in jdk 8.0.382.

* <fix>(CI): add CI rare string test.
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0.72464% with 411 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 14.88%. Comparing base (db7f185) to head (9c2d7be).

❗ Current head 9c2d7be differs from pull request most recent head b08daea. Consider uploading reports for the commit b08daea to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master     #606      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     15.57%   14.88%   -0.70%     
+ Complexity      441      435       -6     
============================================
  Files           185      186       +1     
  Lines          8692     9008     +316     
  Branches        748      769      +21     
============================================
- Hits           1354     1341      -13     
- Misses         7220     7549     +329     
  Partials        118      118              
Files Coverage Δ
...java/com/webank/wecross/common/WeCrossDefault.java 66.66% <ø> (ø)
...m/webank/wecross/interchain/InterchainDefault.java 0.00% <ø> (ø)
...webank/wecross/interchain/InterchainErrorCode.java 0.00% <ø> (ø)
...bank/wecross/network/rpc/URIHandlerDispatcher.java 82.55% <100.00%> (+0.20%) ⬆️
...main/java/com/webank/wecross/stub/Transaction.java 30.00% <ø> (-7.50%) ⬇️
...work/p2p/netty/channel/handler/ChannelHandler.java 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/main/java/com/webank/wecross/Generator.java 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...stserver/response/CompleteTransactionResponse.java 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...main/java/com/webank/wecross/stub/BlockHeader.java 17.39% <0.00%> (-2.61%) ⬇️
...a/com/webank/wecross/stub/TransactionResponse.java 48.38% <0.00%> (-12.33%) ⬇️
... and 11 more

... and 5 files with indirect coverage changes

@kyonRay kyonRay merged commit 0e94856 into WeBankBlockchain:master Mar 4, 2024
10 of 11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants