Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add E4 rules to ruff #963

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 4, 2024

Conversation

johannaengland
Copy link
Contributor

@johannaengland johannaengland commented Nov 27, 2024

Dependent on #962.

Slightly up for discussion (if we do not add it, then we have to remove it from the Argus-HTMX workflow)

@johannaengland johannaengland added the discussion Requires developer feedback/discussion before implementation label Nov 27, 2024
@johannaengland johannaengland self-assigned this Nov 27, 2024
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Nov 27, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 82.44%. Comparing base (0b3278f) to head (492d268).
Report is 3 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #963   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   82.44%   82.44%           
=======================================
  Files         132      132           
  Lines        4866     4866           
=======================================
  Hits         4012     4012           
  Misses        854      854           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Dec 4, 2024

@johannaengland johannaengland merged commit c83f348 into Uninett:master Dec 4, 2024
11 of 12 checks passed
@johannaengland johannaengland deleted the ruff/add-E4-rules branch December 4, 2024 12:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
discussion Requires developer feedback/discussion before implementation lint/reformat
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants