Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BlocksOnCylindrical refactor and add axial bucket gaps #1400

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

robbietuk
Copy link
Collaborator

Attempts to address some issues found with GeometryBlocksOnCylindrical, as detailed here #1388, and add gaps between buckets.

Changes in this pull request

  • Refactor of GeometryBlocksOnCylindrical. Significant change to the calculations of build_crystal_maps.
  • Refactor of Scanner. This added a number of simplifications to the way the get_* methods work around buckets/block/crystal gaps and numbers

Testing performed

  • Additional testing for GeometryBlocksOnCylindricalTests.

Related issues

Checklist before requesting a review

  • [] I have performed a self-review of my code
  • [] I have added docstrings/doxygen in line with the guidance in the developer guide
  • [] I have implemented unit tests that cover any new or modified functionality (if applicable)
  • [] The code builds and runs on my machine
  • [] documentation/release_XXX.md has been updated with any functionality change (if applicable)

@robbietuk
Copy link
Collaborator Author

robbietuk commented Mar 19, 2024

Currently, a number of tests are failing, I might have broken something with symmetries etc...

@KrisThielemans
Copy link
Collaborator

@markus-jehl this one might be somewhat relevant to your problem.

@robbietuk
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Marking this as draft as I never finished it and my work went in a different direction. It might be a good template for the future.

@robbietuk robbietuk marked this pull request as draft November 2, 2024 02:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants