Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update CSS to version 7 #12

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 30, 2024

Conversation

surilindur
Copy link
Contributor

Here is a small set of changes to update the CSS version to 7, and to adjust the use of it in code and fix the unit tests. The new configuration has been tested to work when serving the generated dataset and only doing reading (since locking is still disabled, as it was previously).

If there is anything that could or should be changed, I can do that.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Feb 20, 2024

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 8894987796

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 100.0%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 6611244847: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 116
Relevant Lines: 116

💛 - Coveralls

@rubensworks
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks! Remind me to merge this one once the fragmenter stuff is ready :-)

@surilindur surilindur force-pushed the chore/update-css-v7 branch from f19ef16 to eec63bd Compare April 30, 2024 12:44
@surilindur
Copy link
Contributor Author

This is ready to be merged on its own, I think it would make for a cleaner commit history than adding everything else also in this same PR. Would that be okay?

@rubensworks rubensworks merged commit 8f60211 into SolidBench:master Apr 30, 2024
4 checks passed
@rubensworks
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks!

@surilindur surilindur deleted the chore/update-css-v7 branch April 30, 2024 13:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants