Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clarify DistributedUniqueTimeProvider.currentTimeMillis() isn't intend to be unique and add tests #622 #623

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Apr 15, 2024

Conversation

peter-lawrey
Copy link
Member

…ded to be unique and add tests #622

@peter-lawrey peter-lawrey changed the title Clarify DistributedUniqueTimeProvider.currentTimeMillis() isn't inten… Clarify DistributedUniqueTimeProvider.currentTimeMillis() isn't inten Apr 10, 2024
@peter-lawrey peter-lawrey changed the title Clarify DistributedUniqueTimeProvider.currentTimeMillis() isn't inten Clarify DistributedUniqueTimeProvider.currentTimeMillis() isn't intend to be unique and add tests #622 Apr 10, 2024
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Apr 10, 2024

@peter-lawrey peter-lawrey merged commit 26d7fbc into develop Apr 15, 2024
10 of 11 checks passed
@peter-lawrey peter-lawrey deleted the bytes/issues/622 branch April 15, 2024 14:29
peter-lawrey added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2024
…d to be unique and add tests #622 (#623)

* Clarify DistributedUniqueTimeProvider.currentTimeMillis() isn't intended to be unique and add tests #622

* Clarify DistributedUniqueTimeProvider.currentTimeMillis() isn't intended to be unique and add tests #622

* Clarify DistributedUniqueTimeProvider.currentTimeMillis() isn't intended to be unique and add tests #622

* Revert removal of deprecated method
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants