Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clarify DistributedUniqueTimeProvider.currentTimeMillis() isn't intended to be unique and add tests #622

Open
peter-lawrey opened this issue Apr 10, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@peter-lawrey
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@peter-lawrey peter-lawrey self-assigned this Apr 10, 2024
@peter-lawrey peter-lawrey changed the title Improve documentation for DistributedUniqueTimeProvider.currentTimeMillis() and add tests Clarify DistributedUniqueTimeProvider.currentTimeMillis() isn't intended to be unique and add tests Apr 10, 2024
peter-lawrey added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 10, 2024
peter-lawrey added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 10, 2024
peter-lawrey added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 10, 2024
peter-lawrey added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 15, 2024
…d to be unique and add tests #622 (#623)

* Clarify DistributedUniqueTimeProvider.currentTimeMillis() isn't intended to be unique and add tests #622

* Clarify DistributedUniqueTimeProvider.currentTimeMillis() isn't intended to be unique and add tests #622

* Clarify DistributedUniqueTimeProvider.currentTimeMillis() isn't intended to be unique and add tests #622

* Revert removal of deprecated method
peter-lawrey added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 15, 2024
…d to be unique and add tests #622 (#623)

* Clarify DistributedUniqueTimeProvider.currentTimeMillis() isn't intended to be unique and add tests #622

* Clarify DistributedUniqueTimeProvider.currentTimeMillis() isn't intended to be unique and add tests #622

* Clarify DistributedUniqueTimeProvider.currentTimeMillis() isn't intended to be unique and add tests #622

* Revert removal of deprecated method
@tgd
Copy link
Contributor

tgd commented Jun 3, 2024

Hi @peter-lawrey can this one be closed?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants