-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 84
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Clarify DistributedUniqueTimeProvider.currentTimeMillis() isn't intended to be unique and add tests #622
Comments
peter-lawrey
changed the title
Improve documentation for DistributedUniqueTimeProvider.currentTimeMillis() and add tests
Clarify DistributedUniqueTimeProvider.currentTimeMillis() isn't intended to be unique and add tests
Apr 10, 2024
peter-lawrey
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 10, 2024
…ded to be unique and add tests #622
peter-lawrey
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 10, 2024
…ded to be unique and add tests #622
peter-lawrey
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 10, 2024
…ded to be unique and add tests #622
peter-lawrey
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 15, 2024
…d to be unique and add tests #622 (#623) * Clarify DistributedUniqueTimeProvider.currentTimeMillis() isn't intended to be unique and add tests #622 * Clarify DistributedUniqueTimeProvider.currentTimeMillis() isn't intended to be unique and add tests #622 * Clarify DistributedUniqueTimeProvider.currentTimeMillis() isn't intended to be unique and add tests #622 * Revert removal of deprecated method
peter-lawrey
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 15, 2024
…d to be unique and add tests #622 (#623) * Clarify DistributedUniqueTimeProvider.currentTimeMillis() isn't intended to be unique and add tests #622 * Clarify DistributedUniqueTimeProvider.currentTimeMillis() isn't intended to be unique and add tests #622 * Clarify DistributedUniqueTimeProvider.currentTimeMillis() isn't intended to be unique and add tests #622 * Revert removal of deprecated method
Hi @peter-lawrey can this one be closed? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
No description provided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: