Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[rtefsutils] Add LexicallyNormal function (#663) #1077

Conversation

grasci-arm
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 27, 2023

Test Results

    7 files    53 suites   6m 4s ⏱️
186 tests 169 ✔️ 17 💤 0
692 runs  624 ✔️ 68 💤 0

Results for commit 1591273.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 27, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #1077 (1591273) into main (b0ddd9e) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1077   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   55.12%   55.12%           
=======================================
  Files         116      116           
  Lines       22779    22779           
  Branches    12656    12656           
=======================================
  Hits        12558    12558           
  Misses       8040     8040           
  Partials     2181     2181           
Flag Coverage Δ
buildmgr-cov 77.87% <ø> (ø)
packchk-cov 64.16% <ø> (ø)
packgen-cov 81.72% <ø> (ø)
projmgr-cov 82.45% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files Changed Coverage Δ
tools/projmgr/src/ProjMgrYamlParser.cpp 74.54% <100.00%> (ø)

@edriouk edriouk merged commit 9b487dd into Open-CMSIS-Pack:main Jul 28, 2023
100 checks passed
@edriouk edriouk deleted the outbound/rtefsutils-add-lexical-normal branch July 28, 2023 07:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants