tusd: init at 1.8.0

[nh2]

Description of changes

• Packages tusd, the reference server implementation of https://tus.io
• As requested on Installation using package managers tus/tusd#683
• Also a NixOS VM test
• The curl-based test upload script is from Curl like client to test tus API implementation? tus/tus.io#96 (comment)

I would like to have co-maintainers for this, since I'm just trying out tusd currently.

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandbox = true set in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 22.05 Release Notes (or backporting 21.11 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • (Release notes changes) Ran nixos/doc/manual/md-to-db.sh to update generated release notes
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

[onny]

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 167076 run on x86_64-linux 1

1 package built:

• tusd

[onny]

@ofborg build nixosTests.tusd

[nixos-discourse]

This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/packages-looking-for-a-maintainer/5442/7

[nh2]

I converted to a draft PR because

I would like to have co-maintainers for this, since I'm just trying out tusd currently.

[kalbasit]

Shame to see your work going to waste, I volunteer to help you maintain this. Can you get it rebased? Also, you might as well move the package to the new per name format.

[kalbasit]

Suggested change

	maintainers = with maintainers; [ nh2 ];
	maintainers = with maintainers; [ nh2 kalbasit ];