Skip to content

NeelKanwal/Equipping-Computational-Pathology-Systems-with-Artifact-Processing-Pipeline

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

63 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

Equipping-Computational-Pathology-Systems-with-Artifact-Processing-Pipeline

This repository contains source-code for paper "Equipping Computational Pathology Systems with Artifact Processing Pipelines: A Showcase for Computation and Performance Trade-offs"

#Abstract Histopathology is a gold standard for cancer diagnosis under a microscopic examination. However, histological tissue processing procedures result in artifacts, which are ultimately transferred to the digitized version of glass slides, known as whole slide images (WSIs). Artifacts are diagnostically irrelevant areas and may result in wrong deep learning (DL) algorithms predictions. Therefore, detecting and excluding artifacts in the computational pathology (CPATH) system is essential for reliable automated diagnosis. In this paper, we propose a mixture of experts (MoE) scheme for detecting five notable artifacts, including damaged tissue, blur, folded tissue, air bubbles, and histologically irrelevant blood from WSIs. First, we train independent binary DL models as experts to capture particular artifact morphology. Then, we ensemble their predictions using a fusion mechanism. We apply probabilistic thresholding over the final probability distribution to improve the sensitivity of the MoE. We developed DL pipelines using two MoEs and two multiclass models of state-of-the-art deep convolutional neural networks (DCNNs) and vision transformers (ViTs). DCNNs-based MoE and ViTs-based MoE schemes outperformed simpler multiclass models and were tested on datasets from different hospitals and cancer types, where MoE using DCNNs yielded the best results. The proposed MoE yields 86.15% F1 and 97.93% sensitivity scores on unseen data, retaining less computational cost for inference than MoE using ViTs. This best performance of MoEs comes with relatively higher computational trade-offs than multiclass models. The proposed artifact detection pipeline will not only ensure reliable CPATH predictions but may also provide quality control.

Link to preprint: https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.07743

An overview figure from the paper:

image

Requirements

  • Histolab
  • Pytorch
  • Pandas
  • Numpy
  • Scikit-learn
  • Timm
  • Pyvips
  • OpenSlide python
  • MMCV

Use requirement.txt for complete packages.

Dataset

The dataset is publicly available at Zenodo. https://zenodo.org/records/10809442.

This work only uses D40x for training and development.

- D40x\path_to_dataset\
      - training
            -- artifact_free
            -- blood
            -- blur
            -- air bubbles
            -- damaged tissue
            -- folded tissue
      - validation
            -- artifact_free
            -- blood
            -- blur
            -- air bubbles
            -- damaged tissue
            -- folded tissue
       - test
            -- artifact_free
            -- blood
            -- blur
            -- air bubbles
            -- damaged tissue
            -- folded tissue

Model weights

Model weights can be downloaded from the model_weights directory or Google drive: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/12p6dyHOHvr9Yg36R0XFjKE0X-Tn3Qqfl?usp=sharing

image image
  • To process your WSIs for preparing a dataset, use files in the preprocess directory.
  • Link to the publicly available processed dataset: TBA

The proposed MoE approach

image

Results

image image

Cite

@misc{kanwal2024equipping,
    title={Equipping Computational Pathology Systems with Artifact Processing Pipelines: A Showcase for Computation and Performance Trade-offs},
    author={Neel Kanwal and Farbod Khoraminia and Umay Kiraz and Andres Mosquera-Zamudio and Carlos Monteagudo and Emiel A. M. Janssen and Tahlita C. M. Zuiverloon and Chunmig Rong and Kjersti Engan},
    year={2024},
    eprint={2403.07743},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    primaryClass={eess.IV}
}

Other works on HistoArtifact datasets:

  1. Vision-Transformers-for-Small-Histological-Datasets-Learned-Through-Knowledge-Distillation : https://github.com/NeelKanwal/Vision-Transformers-for-Small-Histological-Datasets-Learned-Through-Knowledge-Distillation
  2. Quantifying-the-effect-of-color-processing-on-blood-and-damaged-tissue-detection: https://github.com/NeelKanwal/Quantifying-the-effect-of-color-processing-on-blood-and-damaged-tissue-detection
  3. Are you sure it’s an artifact? Artifact detection and uncertainty quantification in histological images: https://github.com/NeelKanwal/DeepKernelLearning