-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
- Loading branch information
Showing
1 changed file
with
20 additions
and
7 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,7 +1,20 @@ | ||
@article{plaza2024emotionsurvey, | ||
title={Emotion Analysis in NLP: Trends, Gaps and Roadmap for Future Directions}, | ||
author={Flor Miriam Plaza-del-Arco, Alba Curry, Amanda Cercas Curry, Dirk Hovy}, | ||
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.01222}, | ||
year={2024}, | ||
abstract = "Emotions are a central aspect of communication. Consequently, emotion analysis (EA) is a rapidly growing field in natural language processing (NLP). However, there is no consensus on scope, direction, or methods. In this paper, we conduct a thorough review of 154 relevant NLP publications from the last decade. Based on this review, we address four different questions: (1) How are EA tasks defined in NLP? (2) What are the most prominent emotion frameworks and which emotions are modeled? (3) Is the subjectivity of emotions considered in terms of demographics and cultural factors? and (4) What are the primary NLP applications for EA? We take stock of trends in EA and tasks, emotion frameworks used, existing datasets, methods, and applications. We then discuss four lacunae: (1) the absence of demographic and cultural aspects does not account for the variation in how emotions are perceived, but instead assumes they are universally experienced in the same manner; (2) the poor fit of emotion categories from the two main emotion theories to the task; (3) the lack of standardized EA terminology hinders gap identification, comparison, and future goals; and (4) the absence of interdisciplinary research isolates EA from insights in other fields. Our work will enable more focused research into EA and a more holistic approach to modeling emotions in NLP." | ||
} | ||
@inproceedings{plaza-del-arco-etal-2024-emotion-analysis, | ||
title = "Emotion Analysis in {NLP}: Trends, Gaps and Roadmap for Future Directions", | ||
author = "{Plaza-del-Arco}, Flor Miriam and | ||
Cercas Curry, Alba A. and | ||
Cercas Curry, Amanda and | ||
Hovy, Dirk", | ||
editor = "Calzolari, Nicoletta and | ||
Kan, Min-Yen and | ||
Hoste, Veronique and | ||
Lenci, Alessandro and | ||
Sakti, Sakriani and | ||
Xue, Nianwen", | ||
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 2024 Joint International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-COLING 2024)", | ||
month = may, | ||
year = "2024", | ||
address = "Torino, Italia", | ||
publisher = "ELRA and ICCL", | ||
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2024.lrec-main.506", | ||
pages = "5696--5710", | ||
} |