Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor: Improve readability, maintainability, and reusability #488

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

saikumarmamidala
Copy link

This pull request includes multiple refactoring changes to enhance code quality:

Extract sequence logic into getNextSequence:

Improves readability by isolating sequence calculation logic into a dedicated method.
Rename getNextSequence to calculateNextSequence:

Provides a more descriptive name for the method, reflecting its purpose of performing calculations rather than simple retrieval.
Decompose onEvent switch-case into separate methods:

Enhances clarity and modularity by breaking down the switch-case logic into smaller, focused methods.
Pull down variable to improve encapsulation and readability:

Moves a variable to the appropriate scope to better align with its usage and improve encapsulation.
Replace magic literal with named constant RUNNING:

Enhances maintainability by replacing the true literal with a descriptive constant, improving code clarity.
Move common fields to AbstractQueueProcessor superclass:

Promotes reusability and maintainability by centralizing shared fields in the superclass, simplifying subclass implementations.
These changes collectively improve the code's modularity, readability, and scalability while adhering to clean code principles.

@SamBarker
Copy link
Contributor

Personally I don't think the refactoring add any meaningful value. The methods extracted don't hide much in the way of complexity or aid in understanding in the calling code.

@@ -57,7 +58,7 @@ public void halt()
@Override
public void run()
{
running = true;
running = RUNNING;
while (true)

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This line of code looks so interested to me. It takes me back to 2014 when I saw my friend create a constant ZERO = 0. So, in my point of view, we can keep this running = true following KISS

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants