-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 260
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Headers support for SPV_INTEL_maximum_registers extension #416
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
'Named Maximum Number of Registers' enum probably should also be added, see "category" : "ValueEnum"
"enumerant" : "NamedMaximumRegistersINTEL", | ||
"value" : 6463, | ||
"parameters" : [ | ||
{ "kind" : "LiteralInteger", "name" : "'Named Maximum Number of Registers'" } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Question goes to @bashbaug , with the spelling from KhronosGroup/SPIRV-Registry#235 "kind" : "LiteralInteger"
seems to be correct. But I have a feeling, that intention here should be to change kind to "kind" : "NamedMaximumNumberofRegisters"
binding the parameter with possible values to be used by validator. So, should we adjust the spec a bit for this? Not sure if I have enough understanding, when we should spell out possible values for a literal parameter.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good catch - I do think this would make validation easier, and the disassembled SPIR-V might be a little nicer also.
Can you have a look at my suggested change on the spec PR to be sure this is what you're thinking of?
KhronosGroup/SPIRV-Registry#235 (comment)
Let me know if you need help with any other tooling, also.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I accepted the spec suggestion. Let's go with the "NamedMaximumNumberOfRegisters" "kind". Thanks!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Create a PR to Tools to support operand kind there too: KhronosGroup/SPIRV-Tools#5580
Merging as discussed in the February 28th teleconference. |
…up#416) * Headers support for SPV_INTEL_maximum_registers extension * Use an operand kind for the named maximum number of registers * apply CI suggestions
Spec: KhronosGroup/SPIRV-Registry#235