Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Spatial joins #113

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Apr 23, 2024
7 changes: 6 additions & 1 deletion Project.toml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -8,17 +8,21 @@ CoordinateTransformations = "150eb455-5306-5404-9cee-2592286d6298"
GeoInterface = "cf35fbd7-0cd7-5166-be24-54bfbe79505f"
GeometryBasics = "5c1252a2-5f33-56bf-86c9-59e7332b4326"
LinearAlgebra = "37e2e46d-f89d-539d-b4ee-838fcccc9c8e"
SortTileRecursiveTree = "746ee33f-1797-42c2-866d-db2fce69d14d"
Statistics = "10745b16-79ce-11e8-11f9-7d13ad32a3b2"
Tables = "bd369af6-aec1-5ad0-b16a-f7cc5008161c"

[weakdeps]
FlexiJoins = "e37f2e79-19fa-4eb7-8510-b63b51fe0a37"
Proj = "c94c279d-25a6-4763-9509-64d165bea63e"

[extensions]
GeometryOpsFlexiJoinsExt = "FlexiJoins"
GeometryOpsProjExt = "Proj"

[compat]
CoordinateTransformations = "0.5, 0.6"
FlexiJoins = "0.1.30"
GeoInterface = "1.2"
GeometryBasics = "0.4.7"
LinearAlgebra = "1"
Expand All @@ -32,6 +36,7 @@ ArchGDAL = "c9ce4bd3-c3d5-55b8-8973-c0e20141b8c3"
CoordinateTransformations = "150eb455-5306-5404-9cee-2592286d6298"
DataFrames = "a93c6f00-e57d-5684-b7b6-d8193f3e46c0"
Distributions = "31c24e10-a181-5473-b8eb-7969acd0382f"
FlexiJoins = "e37f2e79-19fa-4eb7-8510-b63b51fe0a37"
GeoFormatTypes = "68eda718-8dee-11e9-39e7-89f7f65f511f"
GeoJSON = "61d90e0f-e114-555e-ac52-39dfb47a3ef9"
JLD2 = "033835bb-8acc-5ee8-8aae-3f567f8a3819"
Expand All @@ -42,4 +47,4 @@ Shapefile = "8e980c4a-a4fe-5da2-b3a7-4b4b0353a2f4"
Test = "8dfed614-e22c-5e08-85e1-65c5234f0b40"

[targets]
test = ["ArchGDAL", "CoordinateTransformations", "DataFrames", "Distributions", "GeoFormatTypes", "GeoJSON", "Proj", "JLD2", "LibGEOS", "Random", "Shapefile", "Test"]
test = ["ArchGDAL", "CoordinateTransformations", "DataFrames", "Distributions", "FlexiJoins", "GeoFormatTypes", "GeoJSON", "Proj", "JLD2", "LibGEOS", "Random", "Shapefile", "Test"]
4 changes: 4 additions & 0 deletions docs/Project.toml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -12,6 +12,8 @@ Distributions = "31c24e10-a181-5473-b8eb-7969acd0382f"
Documenter = "e30172f5-a6a5-5a46-863b-614d45cd2de4"
DocumenterVitepress = "4710194d-e776-4893-9690-8d956a29c365"
DoubleFloats = "497a8b3b-efae-58df-a0af-a86822472b78"
FlexiJoins = "e37f2e79-19fa-4eb7-8510-b63b51fe0a37"
GADM = "a8dd9ffe-31dc-4cf5-a379-ea69100a8233"
ExactPredicates = "429591f6-91af-11e9-00e2-59fbe8cec110"
GeoDatasets = "ddc7317b-88db-5cb5-a849-8449e5df04f9"
GeoInterface = "cf35fbd7-0cd7-5166-be24-54bfbe79505f"
Expand All @@ -23,6 +25,8 @@ LibGEOS = "a90b1aa1-3769-5649-ba7e-abc5a9d163eb"
Literate = "98b081ad-f1c9-55d3-8b20-4c87d4299306"
Makie = "ee78f7c6-11fb-53f2-987a-cfe4a2b5a57a"
MakieThemes = "e296ed71-da82-5faf-88ab-0034a9761098"
Measurements = "eff96d63-e80a-5855-80a2-b1b0885c5ab7"
MonteCarloMeasurements = "0987c9cc-fe09-11e8-30f0-b96dd679fdca"
MultiFloats = "bdf0d083-296b-4888-a5b6-7498122e68a5"
Printf = "de0858da-6303-5e67-8744-51eddeeeb8d7"
Proj = "c94c279d-25a6-4763-9509-64d165bea63e"
Expand Down
3 changes: 3 additions & 0 deletions docs/make.jl
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -94,6 +94,9 @@ makedocs(;
pages=[
"Introduction" => "introduction.md",
"API Reference" => "api.md",
"Tutorials" => [
"Spatial Joins" => "tutorials/spatial_joins.md",
],
"Explanations" => [
"Paradigms" => "paradigms.md",
"Peculiarities" => "peculiarities.md",
Expand Down
135 changes: 135 additions & 0 deletions docs/src/tutorials/spatial_joins.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,135 @@
# Spatial joins

Spatial joins are [table joins](https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/sql-join-set-1-inner-left-right-and-full-joins/) which are based not on equality, but on some predicate ``p(x, y)``, which takes two geometries, and returns a value of either `true` or `false`. For geometries, the [`DE-9IM`](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DE-9IM) spatial relationship model is used to determine the spatial relationship between two geometries.

Spatial joins can be done between any geometry types (from geometrycollections to points), just as geometrical predicates can be evaluated on any geometries.

In this tutorial, we will show how to perform a spatial join on first a toy dataset and then two Natural Earth datasets, to show how this can be used in the real world.

In order to perform the spatial join, we use **[FlexiJoins.jl](https://github.com/JuliaAPlavin/FlexiJoins.jl)** to perform the join, specifically using its `by_pred` joining method. This allows the user to specify a predicate in the following manner:
```julia
[inner/left/right/outer/...]join((table1, table1),
by_pred(:table1_column, predicate_function, :table2_column) # & add other conditions here
)
```

We have enabled the use of all of GeometryOps' boolean comparisons here. These are:

```julia
GO.contains, GO.within, GO.intersects, GO.touches, GO.crosses, GO.disjoint, GO.overlaps, GO.covers, GO.coveredby, GO.equals
```

!!! tip
Always place the dataframe with more complex geometries second, as that is the one which will be sorted into a tree.

## Simple example

This example demonstrates how to perform a spatial join between two datasets: a set of polygons and a set of randomly generated points.

The polygons are represented as a DataFrame with geometries and colors, while the points are stored in a separate DataFrame.

The spatial join is performed using the `contains` predicate from GeometryOps, which checks if each point is contained within any of the polygons. The resulting joined DataFrame is then used to plot the points, colored according to the containing polygon.

First, we generate our data. We create two triangle polygons which, together, span the rectangle (0, 0, 1, 1), and a set of points which are randomly distributed within this rectangle.

```@example spatialjoins
import GeoInterface as GI, GeometryOps as GO
using FlexiJoins, DataFrames
using CairoMakie, GeoInterfaceMakie
pl = GI.Polygon([GI.LinearRing([(0, 0), (1, 0), (1, 1), (0, 0)])])
pu = GI.Polygon([GI.LinearRing([(0, 0), (0, 1), (1, 1), (0, 0)])])
poly_df = DataFrame(geometry = [pl, pu], color = [:red, :blue])
f, a, p = Makie.with_theme(Attributes(; Axis = (; aspect = DataAspect()))) do # hide
f, a, p = poly(poly_df.geometry; color = tuple.(poly_df.color, 0.3))
end # hide
```

Here, the upper polygon is blue, and the lower polygon is red. Keep this in mind!

Now, we generate the points.

```@example spatialjoins
points = tuple.(rand(1000), rand(1000))
points_df = DataFrame(geometry = points)
scatter!(points_df.geometry)
f
```

You can see that they are evenly distributed around the box. But how do we know which points are in which polygons?

We have to join the two dataframes based on which polygon (if any) each point lies within.

Now, we can perform the "spatial join" using FlexiJoins. We are performing an outer join here

```@example spatialjoins
@time joined_df = FlexiJoins.innerjoin(
(points_df, poly_df),
by_pred(:geometry, GO.within, :geometry)
)
```

```@example spatialjoins
scatter!(a, joined_df.geometry; color = joined_df.color)
f
```

Here, you can see that the colors were assigned appropriately to the scattered points!

## Real-world example

Suppose I have a list of polygons representing administrative regions (or mining sites, or what have you), and I have a list of polygons for each country. I want to find the country each region is in.

```julia real
import GeoInterface as GI, GeometryOps as GO
using FlexiJoins, DataFrames, GADM # GADM gives us country and sublevel geometry

using CairoMakie, GeoInterfaceMakie

country_df = GADM.get.(["JPN", "USA", "IND", "DEU", "FRA"]) |> DataFrame
country_df.geometry = GI.GeometryCollection.(GO.tuples.(country_df.geom))

state_doublets = [
("USA", "New York"),
("USA", "California"),
("IND", "Karnataka"),
("DEU", "Berlin"),
("FRA", "Grand Est"),
("JPN", "Tokyo"),
]

state_full_df = (x -> GADM.get(x...)).(state_doublets) |> DataFrame
state_full_df.geom = GO.tuples.(only.(state_full_df.geom))
state_compact_df = state_full_df[:, [:geom, :NAME_1]]
```

```julia real
innerjoin((state_compact_df, country_df), by_pred(:geom, GO.within, :geometry))
innerjoin((state_compact_df, view(country_df, 1:1, :)), by_pred(:geom, GO.within, :geometry))
```

!!! warning
This is how you would do this, but it doesn't work yet, since the GeometryOps predicates are quite slow on large polygons. If you try this, the code will continue to run for a very, very long time (it took 12 hours on my laptop, but with minimal CPU usage).

## Enabling custom predicates

In case you want to use a custom predicate, you only need to define a method to tell FlexiJoins how to use it.

For example, let's suppose you wanted to perform a spatial join on geometries which are some distance away from each other:

```julia
my_predicate_function = <(5) abs GO.distance
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If this is an actual distance, it's probably already supported by FlexiJoins :)

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think this is supported by Distances.jl, and there are a bunch of other GO functions one might want to use :D - for example, testing whether centroids are close to each other, or something. So I figured a general approach would be best.

Just out of curiosity, is there a reason that NestedLoopFast isn't supported by default?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

for example, testing whether centroids are close to each other

Isn't it just by_distance(x -> centroid(x.geometry), Euclidean(), <=(3))? Or whatever other distance you need instead of Euclidean.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think this is supported by Distances.jl

Wonder why is that the case? Does the function break some distance properties?

Copy link
Contributor

@aplavin aplavin Apr 19, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is there a reason that NestedLoopFast isn't supported by default?

I consider falling back to n^2 join without user explicitly requesting it is a footgun.
NestedLoopFast is really intended for cheap filtering operations on top of the "main" join predicate. Such as NotSame in FlexiJoins itself.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For centroids yes, but if computing the distance between geometries (basically distance between closest linesegments) then that's not a Distances.jl thing. The centroid comparison would be that though, and I should probably add an example of that syntax to the docs as well!

```

You would need to define `FlexiJoins.supports_mode` on your predicate:

```julia{3}
FlexiJoins.supports_mode(
::FlexiJoins.Mode.NestedLoopFast,
::FlexiJoins.ByPred{typeof(my_predicate_function)},
datas
) = true
```

This will enable FlexiJoins to support your custom function, when it's passed to `by_pred(:geometry, my_predicate_function, :geometry)`.
48 changes: 48 additions & 0 deletions ext/GeometryOpsFlexiJoinsExt/GeometryOpsFlexiJoinsExt.jl
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
module GeometryOpsFlexiJoinsExt

using GeometryOps
using FlexiJoins

import GeometryOps as GO, GeoInterface as GI
using SortTileRecursiveTree, Tables


# This module defines the FlexiJoins APIs for GeometryOps' boolean comparison functions, taken from DE-9IM.

# First, we define the joining modes (Tree, NestedLoopFast) that the GO DE-9IM functions support.
const GO_DE9IM_FUNCS = Union{typeof(GO.contains), typeof(GO.within), typeof(GO.intersects), typeof(GO.disjoint), typeof(GO.touches), typeof(GO.crosses), typeof(GO.overlaps), typeof(GO.covers), typeof(GO.coveredby), typeof(GO.equals)}
# NestedLoopFast is the naive fallback method
FlexiJoins.supports_mode(::FlexiJoins.Mode.NestedLoopFast, ::FlexiJoins.ByPred{F}, datas) where F <: GO_DE9IM_FUNCS = true
# This method allows you to cache a tree, which we do by using an STRtree.
# TODO: wrap GO predicate functions in a `TreeJoiner` struct or something, to indicate that we want to use trees,
# since they can be slower in some situations.
FlexiJoins.supports_mode(::FlexiJoins.Mode.Tree, ::FlexiJoins.ByPred{F}, datas) where F <: GO_DE9IM_FUNCS = true

# Nested loop support is simple, and needs no further support.
# However, for trees, we need to define how the tree is prepared and how it is used.
# This is done by defining the `prepare_for_join` function to return an STRTree,
# and by defining the `findmatchix` function as querying that tree before checking
# intersections.

# In theory, one could extract the tree from e.g a GeoPackage or some future GeoDataFrame.

FlexiJoins.prepare_for_join(::FlexiJoins.Mode.Tree, X, cond::FlexiJoins.ByPred{<: GO_DE9IM_FUNCS}) = (X, SortTileRecursiveTree.STRtree(map(cond.Rf, X)))
function FlexiJoins.findmatchix(::FlexiJoins.Mode.Tree, cond::FlexiJoins.ByPred{F}, ix_a, a, (B, tree)::Tuple, multi::typeof(identity)) where F <: GO_DE9IM_FUNCS
idxs = SortTileRecursiveTree.query(tree, cond.Lf(a))
intersecting_idxs = filter!(idxs) do idx
cond.pred(a, cond.Rf(B[idx]))
end
return intersecting_idxs
end

# Finally, for completeness, we define the `swap_sides` function for those predicates which are defined as inversions.

FlexiJoins.swap_sides(::typeof(GO.contains)) = GO.within
FlexiJoins.swap_sides(::typeof(GO.within)) = GO.contains
FlexiJoins.swap_sides(::typeof(GO.coveredby)) = GO.covers
FlexiJoins.swap_sides(::typeof(GO.covers)) = GO.coveredby

# That's a wrap, folks!

end

22 changes: 22 additions & 0 deletions test/extensions/flexijoins.jl
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
import GeometryOps as GO, GeoInterface as GI
using FlexiJoins, DataFrames

pl = GI.Polygon([GI.LinearRing([(0, 0), (1, 0), (1, 1), (0, 0)])])
pu = GI.Polygon([GI.LinearRing([(0, 0), (0, 1), (1, 1), (0, 0)])])
poly_df = DataFrame(geometry = [pl, pu], color = [:red, :blue])

points = tuple.(rand(100), rand(100))
points_df = DataFrame(geometry = points)

@testset "Basic integration" begin

@test_nowarn joined_df = FlexiJoins.innerjoin((poly_df, points_df), by_pred(:geometry, GO.contains, :geometry))
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It would be nice to wrap this and avoid the :geometry :geometry part

Like this maybe:

joined_df = GO.innerjoin(poly_df, points_df, GO.contains)

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I see what you're saying here now - but until we resolve the DataFrames/GI.geometrycolumn/ArchGDAL mess, it's probably best to keep this explicit IMO :D

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it actually a mess? It mostly just works

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In this case yes - GADM for example only outputs tables with geom columns, as do many other ArchGDAL-based loaders.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ArchGDAL tables are fine, GADM returns a NamedTuple. Theres an issue for that

# Test that the join happened correctly
joined_df = FlexiJoins.innerjoin((poly_df, points_df), by_pred(:geometry, GO.contains, :geometry))
@test all(GO.contains.((pl,), joined_df.geometry_1[joined_df.color .== :red]))
@test all(GO.contains.((pu,), joined_df.geometry_1[joined_df.color .== :blue]))
# Test that within also works
@test_nowarn joined_df = FlexiJoins.innerjoin((points_df, poly_df), by_pred(:geometry, GO.within, :geometry))

end

2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions test/runtests.jl
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -41,4 +41,6 @@ const GO = GeometryOps
include("transformations/correction/closed_ring.jl")
include("transformations/correction/intersecting_polygons.jl")
end
# # Extensions
@testset "FlexiJoins" begin include("extensions/flexijoins.jl") end
end
Loading