ESC-406 Fix Mention Extension for Quill #648
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications to the Changes
Poem
Tip CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
client/lib/quill/quillMentionExtension.js (2)
80-80: Consider adding JSDoc documentationWhile the change is correct, it would be helpful to add JSDoc documentation to clarify the expected shape of the mention data structure, especially since we're changing the field identifier.
static value(domNode) { + /** + * @returns {{ + * field: { + * id: string, + * name: string + * }, + * fallback: string + * }} + */ return {
Line range hint
1-150: Consider version management for breaking changesThe change from
nf_idtoidis a breaking change that might affect consumers of this library. Consider:
- Bumping the major version number
- Adding a migration guide in the documentation
- Potentially supporting both field names temporarily with a deprecation warning
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
client/lib/quill/quillMentionExtension.js(3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
client/lib/quill/quillMentionExtension.js (2)
43-49: LGTM! Consistent attribute handling
The changes maintain proper validation while keeping the DOM attribute name stable for backward compatibility.
33-33: Verify handling of existing mentions with nf_id
The change from nf_id to id looks correct, but we should ensure that existing mentions in the database are properly handled.
✅ Verification successful
Let me continue the verification by searching for any usage of nf_id in the codebase, particularly in JavaScript files, since the previous search had issues with the Vue file type.
Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response:
Change from nf_id to id is consistent with the codebase
The change from nf_id to id is correct as:
- No other usage of
nf_idexists in JavaScript files - The codebase consistently uses
idfor field identification in mentions:- MentionDropdown.vue uses
field.id - MentionInput.vue uses
mention.field.id - All mention-field-id attributes use the
idproperty
- MentionDropdown.vue uses
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining usage of nf_id in the codebase
rg "nf_id" --type js --type vue
# Search for mention-related database migrations or schemas
fd -e js -e json "migration|schema" | xargs rg "mention"
Length of output: 71783
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for nf_id in JavaScript files
rg "nf_id" --type js
# Search for mention-related files in the client directory
fd -e js -e vue mention client/ | xargs rg "nf_id|id"
Length of output: 2124
chiragchhatrala
changed the title
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes