Simplify Infisical secrets check workflow in GitHub Actions

[guibranco]

Description

• Streamlined the Infisical secrets check workflow by consolidating multiple steps into a single action.
• Enhanced maintainability and readability of the workflow file.

---

Changes walkthrough 📝

	Relevant files
Enhancement	infisical-secrets-check.yml Simplify Infisical secrets check workflow                                .github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml Replaced multiple steps for Infisical secrets check with a single action. Updated to use guibranco/[email protected]. Removed redundant installation and scanning steps. +2/-85

[penify-dev]

PR Review 🔍

⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]	2, because the changes are straightforward and primarily involve replacing multiple steps with a single action, which simplifies the workflow.
🧪 Relevant tests	No
⚡ Possible issues	No
🔒 Security concerns	No

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@guibranco has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 11 minutes and 16 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between e2cb3b3 and 8424f70.

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  -- @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[penify-dev]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Category	Suggestion	Score
Best practice	Add error handling to the Infisical secrets check step Consider adding error handling for the Infisical secrets check step to ensure that the workflow fails gracefully if the action encounters an issue. .github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml [25-26] - name: Infisical secrets check uses: guibranco/[email protected] +continue-on-error: false Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: Adding error handling is a good practice that ensures the workflow fails gracefully, which is important for maintaining the integrity of CI/CD processes.	8
	Add a timeout to the Infisical secrets check step to prevent indefinite hanging Consider adding a timeout for the Infisical secrets check step to prevent the workflow from hanging indefinitely in case of issues. .github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml [25-26] - name: Infisical secrets check uses: guibranco/[email protected] +timeout-minutes: 10 Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 Why: Adding a timeout is a good practice to prevent indefinite hangs, but it is not as critical as error handling, hence the moderate score.	6
Enhancement	Add a conditional check to limit when the Infisical secrets check runs It may be beneficial to include a conditional check to ensure that the Infisical secrets check only runs on specific branches or events to avoid unnecessary checks. .github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml [25-26] - name: Infisical secrets check uses: guibranco/[email protected] +if: github.ref == 'refs/heads/main' Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: Including a conditional check can optimize workflow runs, but it is a minor enhancement compared to critical error handling.	7
Maintenance	Update the Infisical secrets check action to the latest version Review the version of the Infisical secrets check action being used to ensure it is the latest stable version, as newer versions may contain important updates or bug fixes. .github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml [25-26] - name: Infisical secrets check -uses: guibranco/[email protected] +uses: guibranco/github-infisical-secrets-check-action@latest Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5 Why: While updating to the latest version is generally advisable, this suggestion does not address an immediate issue or bug, making it a lower priority.	5

[github-actions]

Infisical secrets check: ✅ No secrets leaked!

💻 Scan logs

10:10PM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
10:10PM INF 56 commits scanned.
10:10PM INF scan completed in 70.9ms
10:10PM INF no leaks found

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud