[Feature request]: Add pylint
Or ruff
Linting For gempyor
#398
Labels
enhancement
Request for improvement or addition of new feature(s).
gempyor
Concerns the Python core.
low priority
Low priority.
meta/workflow
Relating to CI / issue templates / testing frameworks / etc.
Label
enhancement, gempyor, meta/workflow
Priority Label
low priority
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
To improve developer productivity it would be helpful to add python linting for
gempyor
. This would:Successor to GH-279.
Is your feature request related to a new application, scenario round, pathogen? Please describe.
n/a
Describe the solution you'd like
Either implement usage of
pylint
orruff
in similar style to GH-358. I don't have a strong preference,ruff
seems to be the newer fasterpylint
, butpylint
is tried and true. Whichever is easier to implement. We would need to change whatever the default line length is to match our current formatting withblack
, but otherwise I would be curious to see what issues are caught first before adjusting settings.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: