Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rate limits #464
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Rate limits #464
Changes from 6 commits
8ebd018
5610674
2648337
496f220
af3a8e8
e70e799
3b2293d
0e451b1
31262aa
11e8940
1ea7cc7
f09fea2
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding error handling for missing headers
The parse_rate_limit_headers function should handle cases where headers are missing or invalid.
📝 Committable suggestion
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It looks like the whole pull request still does not completely fix the IP temporary bans, only makes them rarer. Very unfortunate.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Metalhead33, it is indeed unfortunate that the changes only reduce the frequency of IP temporary bans rather than eliminating them entirely. This could indicate that there are additional factors or nuances in Discord's rate-limiting mechanism that are not yet fully accounted for in the implementation.
If you'd like, I can assist in further debugging or refining the logic to better align with Discord's rate-limiting policies. For instance, we could add more detailed logging to capture edge cases or explore alternative strategies for handling rate limits. Let me know how you'd like to proceed!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@coderabbitai By all means, analyze the code any alternative locations where the rate limit might be invokved.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Metalhead33, based on the search results, the following locations in the codebase involve rate limit handling or related headers:
UpdateRateLimits
function:xrateLimit
,xrateRemaining
,xrateReset
,xrateResetAfter
) based on the headers received in API responses.xRateAllowedPerSecond
,xRateAllowedRemaining
, andxRateDelayPerRequest
.parse_rate_limit_headers
function:X-RateLimit-Limit
,X-RateLimit-Remaining
,X-RateLimit-Reset
,X-RateLimit-Reset-After
) from the HTTP response and passes them toUpdateRateLimits
.discord_response_callback
function:parse_rate_limit_headers
to process rate limit headers for each HTTP response.These are the primary locations where rate limit handling is implemented. If you suspect there are additional areas where rate limits might be invoked indirectly or overlooked, we could expand the search to include related terms like "rate", "limit", or "delay" across the codebase. Let me know how you'd like to proceed!
🔗 Analysis chain
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
Length of output: 2326
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve rate limit error handling and logging
The rate limit error handling could be more robust with validation and better logging.