-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add the two current workflows to this fork #11
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
managed to recover the draft IWC tests. Will get the main one working too, then make a PR for the main IWC repository. |
@fubar2 I made a PR to the IWC to make things easier, galaxyproject#559 |
@Delphine-L: Thanks! #557 has the two WF I'd like to take forward as EBPhib-describe and EBPhib-dimer-coverage. Both those WF pass planemo tests when run from my machine, but there is a strange error in the CI so the tests don't actually seem to run here on github although they "pass". Sample test files are in https://github.com/fubar2/iwc/tree/EBPhisb/workflows/VGP-assembly-v2/EBPhib-descriptive/test-data and in https://github.com/fubar2/iwc/tree/EBPhisb/workflows/VGP-assembly-v2/EBPhib-dimer-coverage-SV/test-data The pretext WF is one I don't know anything about. It seems to be generating stand-alone images rather than tracks to be integrated into JBrowse2, and needs test data starting with matching subsamples of HiC F/R reads, to map against subsampled haplotype fasta. Fake telomere/gap bed features are easy to make up, and the small HiC reads and the small haplotypes can be mapped and the bam converted to a small coverage bigwig. Maybe easiest if it becomes an EBPhib subWF because the arima data is the only thing missing |
Just lost a few days work trying to push this - my git-fu is too weak and it will be much safer for me if we work in a real repository :(