Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
IVAR: Can my block display markdown blocks?
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
Croydon committed Apr 2, 2024
1 parent e25cd4f commit 5aedea3
Showing 1 changed file with 6 additions and 4 deletions.
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ The general design of the user study is as follows:
* Post-Questionnaire
* Goodbye / Hardware cleaning

You can find checklists that I made for myself to execute this study with participants in the study data repository ([pre-study checklist](https://github.com/Croydon/tuda-vr-parkour-study/blob/main/pre_study/checklist_for_instructor_to_execute_pre_study.md)), [final study checklist](https://github.com/Croydon/tuda-vr-parkour-study/blob/main/study/checklist_for_instructor_to_execute_post_study.md). Such notes ensure, that every participant hears all explanations and experience all trainings and tasks, in the same order and in the same way.
You can find checklists that I made for myself to execute this study with participants in the study data repository ([pre-study checklist](https://github.com/Croydon/tuda-vr-parkour-study/blob/main/pre_study/checklist_for_instructor_to_execute_pre_study.md), [final study checklist](https://github.com/Croydon/tuda-vr-parkour-study/blob/main/study/checklist_for_instructor_to_execute_post_study.md)). Such notes ensure, that every participant hears all explanations and experience all trainings and tasks, in the same order and in the same way.

During the 10 minute task, I make notes of everything interesting the participant might do and say. Furthermore, there is automatical logging of:
* How many coins were collected in which area and round.
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -194,14 +194,16 @@ Due to time constraints, I could only perform the pre-study and actual study wit

For the pre-study, participants were given an implementation that had a very different locomotion method, no cyber-sickness reduction method and the interaction was done directly by the controllers, without the portals or other more complex things.

I had two participants.
I had two participants (P1, P2), both male, being 29 and 27 years old (average: 28), that have rated their pre-existing experience on a scale from `1 - very inexperiened` to `5 - very experienced`, with a `2` and `1` respectively.

TODO


#### Study

For the final study, I had four participants, that were given the final implementation of the locomation and interaction method and with enabled tunneling vignette.
For the final study, I had four participants (P3 - P6), that were given the final implementation of the locomation and interaction method and with enabled tunneling vignette.

TODO
One participant was female (P3), the others (P4 - P6) are male. The age average was 41.25 years (56, 50, 32, 27). On a scale from 1 to 5, P5 estimated their previous VR experience with a `2`, while everyone else answered with a `1`.


#### Results
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 5aedea3

Please sign in to comment.