You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In Brick v1.4.0, there are some REC classes referenced in the brick:isReplacedBy relationship for deprecated Brick location classes that are not included as REC classes in schema.
Here are a few examples this issue:
rec:TeamRoom
rec:Lounge
NOTE: This may not be a complete list
Here is a detailed example with TeamRoom, so you can better understand the issue that I'm seeing.
Brick:Team_Room isReplacedBy rec:TeamRoom
The rec:TeamRoom is not present as a rdfs:Class in the Brick v1.4.0. release Brick.ttll or Brick+extensions.ttl. Other rec classes listed as replacing Brick location classes have the relationship 'rec: a rdfs:Class' with a label and subClassOf relationship.
In Brick v1.4.0, there are some REC classes referenced in the brick:isReplacedBy relationship for deprecated Brick location classes that are not included as REC classes in schema.
Here are a few examples this issue:
rec:TeamRoom
rec:Lounge
NOTE: This may not be a complete list
Here is a detailed example with TeamRoom, so you can better understand the issue that I'm seeing.
Brick:Team_Room isReplacedBy rec:TeamRoom
The rec:TeamRoom is not present as a rdfs:Class in the Brick v1.4.0. release Brick.ttll or Brick+extensions.ttl. Other rec classes listed as replacing Brick location classes have the relationship 'rec: a rdfs:Class' with a label and subClassOf relationship.
Also, the new ontology documentation doesn't list rec:TeamRoom. Please see
https://ontology.brickschema.org/
In the latest REC documentation, I do see the class: https://dev.realestatecore.io/ontology/Space/Architecture/Room/Team-
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: