Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Add phi3.5 vision evaluation, notes and turn on free playground (#3365)
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history 
* add phi3.5 vision changes

* fix input modalities

---------

Co-authored-by: himanshu chandola <[email protected]>
  • Loading branch information
@hchandola
hchandola and himanshu chandola authored Sep 12, 2024
1 parent 19da8e0 commit 1f8c5b2
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 4 changed files with 132 additions and 135 deletions.
133 changes: 0 additions & 133 deletions assets/models/system/phi-3.5-vision-128k-instruct/description.md
View file
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -20,136 +20,3 @@ Phi-3.5-vision is a lightweight, state-of-the-art open multimodal model built up
| **Status** | This is a static model trained on an offline text dataset with cutoff date March 15, 2024. Future versions of the tuned models may be released as we improve models. |
| **Release date** | August 20, 2024 |
| **License** | MIT |

## Release Notes

In this release, the model enables multi-frame image understanding and reasoning which is based on valuable customer feedback. The hero example multi-frame capabilities include detailed image comparison, multi-image summarization/storytelling and video summarization, which have broad applications in many scenarios. We also observed performance improvement on most single image benchmarks, e.g., boosting MMMU performance from 40.2 to 43.0, MMBench performance from 80.5 to 81.9, document understanding benchmark TextVQA from 70.9 to 72.0. We believe most use cases will benefit from this release, but we encourage users to test the new model in their AI applications. We appreciate the enthusiastic adoption of the Phi-3 model family and continue to welcome all the feedback from the community.

Below are the comparison results on existing multi-image benchmarks. On average, our model outperforms competitor models on the same size and competitive with much bigger models on multi-frame capabilities and video summarization.

BLINK: a benchmark with 14 visual tasks that humans can solve very quickly but are still hard for current multimodal LLMs.

| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-vision-instrust | LlaVA-Interleave-Qwen-7B | InternVL-2-4B | InternVL-2-8B | Gemini-1.5-Flash | GPT-4o-mini | Claude-3.5-Sonnet | Gemini-1.5-Pro | GPT-4o |
|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|
| Art Style | 87.2 | 62.4 | 55.6 | 52.1 | 64.1 | 70.1 | 59.8 | 70.9 | 73.3 |
| Counting | 54.2 | 56.7 | 54.2 | 66.7 | 51.7 | 55.0 | 59.2 | 65.0 | 65.0 |
| Forensic Detection | 92.4 | 31.1 | 40.9 | 34.1 | 54.5 | 38.6 | 67.4 | 60.6 | 75.8 |
| Functional Correspondence | 29.2 | 34.6 | 24.6 | 24.6 | 33.1 | 26.9 | 33.8 | 31.5 | 43.8 |
| IQ Test | 25.3 | 26.7 | 26.0 | 30.7 | 25.3 | 29.3 | 26.0 | 34.0 | 19.3 |
| Jigsaw | 68.0 | 86.0 | 55.3 | 52.7 | 71.3 | 72.7 | 57.3 | 68.0 | 67.3 |
| Multi-View Reasoning | 54.1 | 44.4 | 48.9 | 42.9 | 48.9 | 48.1 | 55.6 | 49.6 | 46.6 |
| Object Localization | 49.2 | 54.9 | 53.3 | 54.1 | 57.3 | 57.4 | 62.3 | 65.6 | 68.0 |
| Relative Depth | 69.4 | 77.4 | 63.7 | 67.7 | 32.8 | 58.1 | 71.8 | 76.6 | 71.0 |
| Relative Reflectance | 37.3 | 34.3 | 32.8 | 38.8 | 32.8 | 27.6 | 36.6 | 38.8 | 40.3 |
| Semantic Correspondence | 36.7 | 31.7 | 31.7 | 22.3 | 32.4 | 31.7 | 45.3 | 48.9 | 54.0 |
| Spatial Relation | 65.7 | 75.5 | 78.3 | 78.3 | 55.9 | 81.1 | 60.1 | 79.0 | 84.6 |
| Visual Correspondence | 53.5 | 40.7 | 34.9 | 33.1 | 29.7 | 52.9 | 72.1 | 81.4 | 86.0 |
| Visual Similarity | 83.0 | 91.9 | 48.1 | 45.2 | 47.4 | 77.8 | 84.4 | 81.5 | 88.1 |
| **Overall** | **57.0** | **53.1** | **45.9** | **45.4** | **45.1** | **51.9** | **56.5** | **61.0** | **63.2** |

Video-MME: comprehensively assess the capabilities of MLLMs in processing video data, covering a wide range of visual domains, temporal durations, and data modalities.

| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-vision-instrust | LlaVA-Interleave-Qwen-7B | InternVL-2-4B | InternVL-2-8B | Gemini-1.5-Flash | GPT-4o-mini | Claude-3.5-Sonnet | Gemini-1.5-Pro | GPT-4o |
|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|
| short (<2min) | 60.8 | 62.3 | 60.7 | 61.7 | 72.2 | 70.1 | 66.3 | 73.3 | 77.7 |
| medium (4-15min) | 47.7 | 47.1 | 46.4 | 49.6 | 62.7 | 59.6 | 54.7 | 61.2 | 68.0 |
| long (30-60) | 43.8 | 41.2 | 42.6 | 46.6 | 52.1 | 53.9 | 46.6 | 53.2 | 59.6 |
| **Overall** | **50.8** | **50.2** | **49.9** | **52.6** | **62.3** | **61.2** | **55.9** | **62.6** | **68.4** |


## Intended Use

### Primary Use Cases

The model is intended for broad commercial and research use in English. The model provides uses for general purpose AI systems and applications with visual and text input capabilities which require:

1) Memory/compute constrained environments
2) Latency bound scenarios
3) General image understanding
4) Optical character recognition
5) Chart and table understanding
6) Multiple image comparison
7) Multi-image or video clip summarization

Our model is designed to accelerate research on language and multimodal models, for use as a building block for generative AI powered features.

### Out-of-Scope Use Cases

Our models are not specifically designed or evaluated for all downstream purposes. Developers should consider common limitations of language models as they select use cases, and evaluate and mitigate for accuracy, safety, and fariness before using within a specific downstream use case, particularly for high risk scenarios. Developers should be aware of and adhere to applicable laws or regulations (including privacy, trade compliance laws, etc.) that are relevant to their use case.

**Nothing contained in this Model Card should be interpreted as or deemed a restriction or modification to the license the model is released under.**

## Responsible AI Considerations

Like other models, the Phi family of models can potentially behave in ways that are unfair, unreliable, or offensive. Some of the limiting behaviors to be aware of include:

* Quality of Service: The Phi models are trained primarily on English text. Languages other than English will experience worse performance. English language varieties with less representation in the training data might experience worse performance than standard American English.
* Representation of Harms & Perpetuation of Stereotypes: These models can over- or under-represent groups of people, erase representation of some groups, or reinforce demeaning or negative stereotypes. Despite safety post-training, these limitations may still be present due to differing levels of representation of different groups or prevalence of examples of negative stereotypes in training data that reflect real-world patterns and societal biases.
* Inappropriate or Offensive Content: These models may produce other types of inappropriate or offensive content, which may make it inappropriate to deploy for sensitive contexts without additional mitigations that are specific to the use case.
* Information Reliability: Language models can generate nonsensical content or fabricate content that might sound reasonable but is inaccurate or outdated.
* Limited Scope for Code: Majority of Phi-3 training data is based in Python and use common packages such as "typing, math, random, collections, datetime, itertools". If the model generates Python scripts that utilize other packages or scripts in other languages, we strongly recommend users manually verify all API uses.

Developers should apply responsible AI best practices and are responsible for ensuring that a specific use case complies with relevant laws and regulations (e.g. privacy, trade, etc.). Important areas for consideration include:

* Allocation: Models may not be suitable for scenarios that could have consequential impact on legal status or the allocation of resources or life opportunities (ex: housing, employment, credit, etc.) without further assessments and additional debiasing techniques.
* High-Risk Scenarios: Developers should assess suitability of using models in high-risk scenarios where unfair, unreliable or offensive outputs might be extremely costly or lead to harm. This includes providing advice in sensitive or expert domains where accuracy and reliability are critical (ex: legal or health advice). Additional safeguards should be implemented at the application level according to the deployment context.
* Misinformation: Models may produce inaccurate information. Developers should follow transparency best practices and inform end-users they are interacting with an AI system. At the application level, developers can build feedback mechanisms and pipelines to ground responses in use-case specific, contextual information, a technique known as Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG).
* Generation of Harmful Content: Developers should assess outputs for their context and use available safety classifiers or custom solutions appropriate for their use case.
* Misuse: Other forms of misuse such as fraud, spam, or malware production may be possible, and developers should ensure that their applications do not violate applicable laws and regulations.
* Identification of individuals: models with vision capabilities may have the potential to uniquely identify individuals in images. Safety post-training steers the model to refuse such requests, but developers should consider and implement, as appropriate, additional mitigations or user consent flows as required in their respective jurisdiction, (e.g., building measures to blur faces in image inputs before processing).

## Training Data

Our training data includes a wide variety of sources, and is a combination of
1) publicly available documents filtered rigorously for quality, selected high-quality educational data and code;
2) selected high-quality image-text interleave data;
3) newly created synthetic, “textbook-like” data for the purpose of teaching math, coding, common sense reasoning, general knowledge of the world (science, daily activities, theory of mind, etc.), newly created image data, e.g., chart/table/diagram/slides, newly created multi-image and video data, e.g., short video clips/pair of two similar images;
4) high quality chat format supervised data covering various topics to reflect human preferences on different aspects such as instruct-following, truthfulness, honesty and helpfulness.

The data collection process involved sourcing information from publicly available documents, with a meticulous approach to filtering out undesirable documents and images. To safeguard privacy, we carefully filtered various image and text data sources to remove or scrub any potentially personal data from the training data.

## Sample Inputs and Outputs (for real-time inference)

### Sample Input

```json
{
"input_data": {
"input_string": [
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image_url",
"image_url": {
"url": "https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/dd/Gfp-wisconsin-madison-the-nature-boardwalk.jpg/2560px-Gfp-wisconsin-madison-the-nature-boardwalk.jpg"
}
},
{
"type": "image_url",
"image_url": {
"url": "https://www.ilankelman.org/stopsigns/australia.jpg"
}
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "What are in these images? What is the difference between two images?"
}
]
}
],
"parameters": { "temperature": 0.7, "max_new_tokens": 2048 }
}
}
```

### Sample Output

```json
{
"output": " The first image depicts a serene, natural landscape featuring a boardwalk winding through a marsh-like area with tall grasses and a clear sky. The second image shows an urban setting with a stop sign in the foreground, a black SUV parked on the street, and traditional Chinese architecture in the background, including a red and gold gate with Chinese characters. The main difference is the setting: one is natural and tranquil, the other is urban and bustling."
}
```

## Trademarks
This project may contain trademarks or logos for projects, products, or services. Authorized use of Microsoft trademarks or logos is subject to and must follow [Microsoft’s Trademark & Brand Guidelines](https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/legal/intellectualproperty/trademarks). Use of Microsoft trademarks or logos in modified versions of this project must not cause confusion or imply Microsoft sponsorship. Any use of third-party trademarks or logos are subject to those third-party’s policies.
32 changes: 32 additions & 0 deletions assets/models/system/phi-3.5-vision-128k-instruct/evaluation.md
View file
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
In this release, the model enables multi-frame image understanding and reasoning which is based on valuable customer feedback. The hero example multi-frame capabilities include detailed image comparison, multi-image summarization/storytelling and video summarization, which have broad applications in many scenarios. We also observed performance improvement on most single image benchmarks, e.g., boosting MMMU performance from 40.2 to 43.0, MMBench performance from 80.5 to 81.9, document understanding benchmark TextVQA from 70.9 to 72.0. We believe most use cases will benefit from this release, but we encourage users to test the new model in their AI applications. We appreciate the enthusiastic adoption of the Phi-3 model family and continue to welcome all the feedback from the community.

Below are the comparison results on existing multi-image benchmarks. On average, our model outperforms competitor models on the same size and competitive with much bigger models on multi-frame capabilities and video summarization.

BLINK: a benchmark with 14 visual tasks that humans can solve very quickly but are still hard for current multimodal LLMs.

| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-vision-instrust | LlaVA-Interleave-Qwen-7B | InternVL-2-4B | InternVL-2-8B | Gemini-1.5-Flash | GPT-4o-mini | Claude-3.5-Sonnet | Gemini-1.5-Pro | GPT-4o |
|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|
| Art Style | 87.2 | 62.4 | 55.6 | 52.1 | 64.1 | 70.1 | 59.8 | 70.9 | 73.3 |
| Counting | 54.2 | 56.7 | 54.2 | 66.7 | 51.7 | 55.0 | 59.2 | 65.0 | 65.0 |
| Forensic Detection | 92.4 | 31.1 | 40.9 | 34.1 | 54.5 | 38.6 | 67.4 | 60.6 | 75.8 |
| Functional Correspondence | 29.2 | 34.6 | 24.6 | 24.6 | 33.1 | 26.9 | 33.8 | 31.5 | 43.8 |
| IQ Test | 25.3 | 26.7 | 26.0 | 30.7 | 25.3 | 29.3 | 26.0 | 34.0 | 19.3 |
| Jigsaw | 68.0 | 86.0 | 55.3 | 52.7 | 71.3 | 72.7 | 57.3 | 68.0 | 67.3 |
| Multi-View Reasoning | 54.1 | 44.4 | 48.9 | 42.9 | 48.9 | 48.1 | 55.6 | 49.6 | 46.6 |
| Object Localization | 49.2 | 54.9 | 53.3 | 54.1 | 57.3 | 57.4 | 62.3 | 65.6 | 68.0 |
| Relative Depth | 69.4 | 77.4 | 63.7 | 67.7 | 32.8 | 58.1 | 71.8 | 76.6 | 71.0 |
| Relative Reflectance | 37.3 | 34.3 | 32.8 | 38.8 | 32.8 | 27.6 | 36.6 | 38.8 | 40.3 |
| Semantic Correspondence | 36.7 | 31.7 | 31.7 | 22.3 | 32.4 | 31.7 | 45.3 | 48.9 | 54.0 |
| Spatial Relation | 65.7 | 75.5 | 78.3 | 78.3 | 55.9 | 81.1 | 60.1 | 79.0 | 84.6 |
| Visual Correspondence | 53.5 | 40.7 | 34.9 | 33.1 | 29.7 | 52.9 | 72.1 | 81.4 | 86.0 |
| Visual Similarity | 83.0 | 91.9 | 48.1 | 45.2 | 47.4 | 77.8 | 84.4 | 81.5 | 88.1 |
| **Overall** | **57.0** | **53.1** | **45.9** | **45.4** | **45.1** | **51.9** | **56.5** | **61.0** | **63.2** |

Video-MME: comprehensively assess the capabilities of MLLMs in processing video data, covering a wide range of visual domains, temporal durations, and data modalities.

| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-vision-instrust | LlaVA-Interleave-Qwen-7B | InternVL-2-4B | InternVL-2-8B | Gemini-1.5-Flash | GPT-4o-mini | Claude-3.5-Sonnet | Gemini-1.5-Pro | GPT-4o |
|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|
| short (<2min) | 60.8 | 62.3 | 60.7 | 61.7 | 72.2 | 70.1 | 66.3 | 73.3 | 77.7 |
| medium (4-15min) | 47.7 | 47.1 | 46.4 | 49.6 | 62.7 | 59.6 | 54.7 | 61.2 | 68.0 |
| long (30-60) | 43.8 | 41.2 | 42.6 | 46.6 | 52.1 | 53.9 | 46.6 | 53.2 | 59.6 |
| **Overall** | **50.8** | **50.2** | **49.9** | **52.6** | **62.3** | **61.2** | **55.9** | **62.6** | **68.4** |
Loading

0 comments on commit 1f8c5b2

Please sign in to comment.