-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. Weβll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bump version #332
Bump version #332
Conversation
The files' contents are under analysis for test generation. |
Korbit doesn't automatically review large (500+ lines changed) pull requests such as this one. If you want me to review anyway, use |
Reviewer's Guide by SourceryThis pull request bumps the project version. The changes include updating the prepare-commit-msg githook and the package-lock.json file. No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation. File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
Important Review skippedReview was skipped due to path filters β Files ignored due to path filters (1)
CodeRabbit blocks several paths by default. You can override this behavior by explicitly including those paths in the path filters. For example, including You can disable this status message by setting the WalkthroughThe Changes
Suggested reviewers
Poem
πͺ§ TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
PR Review π
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey @guibranco - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:
Overall Comments:
- Please provide the old and new version numbers and include a changelog or explanation of what changes necessitate this version bump.
- The pull request appears to be missing the actual diff content showing the version changes. Please ensure all changes are properly included in the PR.
- The automated note in the PR description should be removed and replaced with meaningful content about this change.
Here's what I looked at during the review
- π’ General issues: all looks good
- π’ Security: all looks good
- π’ Testing: all looks good
- π’ Complexity: all looks good
- π’ Documentation: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click π or π on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
π¨ Potential security issues detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub βοΈ To accept the risk, merge this PR and you will not be notified again. Next stepsWhat is debug access?Uses debug, reflection and dynamic code execution features. Removing the use of debug will reduce the risk of any reflection and dynamic code execution. What is dynamic require?Dynamic require can indicate the package is performing dangerous or unsafe dynamic code execution. Packages should avoid dynamic imports when possible. Audit the use of dynamic require to ensure it is not executing malicious or vulnerable code. What is environment variable access?Package accesses environment variables, which may be a sign of credential stuffing or data theft. Packages should be clear about which environment variables they access, and care should be taken to ensure they only access environment variables they claim to. What is dynamic code execution?Package uses dynamic code execution (e.g., eval()), which is a dangerous practice. This can prevent the code from running in certain environments and increases the risk that the code may contain exploits or malicious behavior. Avoid packages that use dynamic code execution like eval(), since this could potentially execute any code. What is unstable ownership?A new collaborator has begun publishing package versions. Package stability and security risk may be elevated. Try to reduce the number of authors you depend on to reduce the risk to malicious actors gaining access to your supply chain. Packages should remove inactive collaborators with publishing rights from packages on npm. What is new author?A new npm collaborator published a version of the package for the first time. New collaborators are usually benign additions to a project, but do indicate a change to the security surface area of a package. Scrutinize new collaborator additions to packages because they now have the ability to publish code into your dependency tree. Packages should avoid frequent or unnecessary additions or changes to publishing rights. What are trivial packages?Packages less than 10 lines of code are easily copied into your own project and may not warrant the additional supply chain risk of an external dependency. Removing this package as a dependency and implementing its logic will reduce supply chain risk. What is filesystem access?Accesses the file system, and could potentially read sensitive data. If a package must read the file system, clarify what it will read and ensure it reads only what it claims to. If appropriate, packages can leave file system access to consumers and operate on data passed to it instead. What are unpopular packages?This package is not very popular. Unpopular packages may have less maintenance and contain other problems. Take a deeper look at the dependencyTake a moment to review the security alert above. Review the linked package source code to understand the potential risk. Ensure the package is not malicious before proceeding. If you're unsure how to proceed, reach out to your security team or ask the Socket team for help at support [AT] socket [DOT] dev. Remove the packageIf you happen to install a dependency that Socket reports as Known Malware you should immediately remove it and select a different dependency. For other alert types, you may may wish to investigate alternative packages or consider if there are other ways to mitigate the specific risk posed by the dependency. Mark a package as acceptable riskTo ignore an alert, reply with a comment starting with
|
PR Code Suggestions β¨
|
New and removed dependencies detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub βοΈ
|
Infisical secrets check: β No secrets leaked! π» Scan logs3:01AM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
3:01AM INF 452 commits scanned.
3:01AM INF scan completed in 1.14s
3:01AM INF no leaks found
|
Quality Gate passedIssues Measures |
User description
π Description
Bump version
β Checks
β’οΈ Does this introduce a breaking change?
Note
I'm currently writing a description for your pull request. I should be done shortly (<1 minute). Please don't edit the description field until I'm finished, or we may overwrite each other. If I find nothing to write about, I'll delete this message.
Description
.githooks/prepare-commit-msg
script for better error handling and functionality.Changes walkthrough π
prepare-commit-msg
Enhance AI Commit Message Generation Script
Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β.githooks/prepare-commit-msg
env
for portability.Summary by CodeRabbit