Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump version #332

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jan 6, 2025
Merged

Bump version #332

merged 5 commits into from
Jan 6, 2025

Conversation

guibranco
Copy link
Member

@guibranco guibranco commented Jan 6, 2025

User description

πŸ“‘ Description

Bump version

βœ… Checks

  • My pull request adheres to the code style of this project
  • My code requires changes to the documentation
  • I have updated the documentation as required
  • All the tests have passed

☒️ Does this introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

Note

I'm currently writing a description for your pull request. I should be done shortly (<1 minute). Please don't edit the description field until I'm finished, or we may overwrite each other. If I find nothing to write about, I'll delete this message.


Description

  • Enhanced the .githooks/prepare-commit-msg script for better error handling and functionality.
  • Added checks for the existence of the commit message file and improved feedback for users.
  • Implemented a backup mechanism for the commit message file before overwriting.
  • Updated the shebang line for better compatibility across different environments.

Changes walkthrough πŸ“

Relevant files
Enhancement
prepare-commit-msg
Enhance AI Commit Message Generation ScriptΒ  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β 

.githooks/prepare-commit-msg

  • Updated shebang to use env for portability.
  • Improved error handling for missing commit message file.
  • Added backup functionality for the commit message file.
  • Enhanced AI message generation with additional checks.
  • +46/-25Β 

    πŸ’‘ Penify usage:
    Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available Penify tools and their descriptions

    Summary by CodeRabbit

    • Chores
      • Updated Git hook script for commit message preparation
      • Improved error handling and script robustness
      • Enhanced file handling and backup mechanisms
      • Added more explicit error checking and messaging
      • Removed unused development dependency from project configuration

    Copy link

    The files' contents are under analysis for test generation.

    Copy link

    korbit-ai bot commented Jan 6, 2025

    Korbit doesn't automatically review large (500+ lines changed) pull requests such as this one. If you want me to review anyway, use /korbit-review.

    @guibranco guibranco enabled auto-merge (squash) January 6, 2025 02:51
    @gstraccini gstraccini bot added the β˜‘οΈ auto-merge Automatic merging of pull requests (gstraccini-bot) label Jan 6, 2025
    Copy link

    sourcery-ai bot commented Jan 6, 2025

    Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

    This pull request bumps the project version. The changes include updating the prepare-commit-msg githook and the package-lock.json file.

    No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

    File-Level Changes

    Change Details Files
    Update version in the prepare-commit-msg githook.
    • Update the version used in the hook script.
    .githooks/prepare-commit-msg
    Update package-lock.json.
    • Regenerate package-lock.json with the new version.
    package-lock.json

    Tips and commands

    Interacting with Sourcery

    • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
    • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
    • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
      issue from a review comment by replying to it.
    • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
      request title to generate a title at any time.
    • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
      the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use
      this command to specify where the summary should be inserted.

    Customizing Your Experience

    Access your dashboard to:

    • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
      summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
    • Change the review language.
    • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
    • Adjust other review settings.

    Getting Help

    Copy link

    coderabbitai bot commented Jan 6, 2025

    Important

    Review skipped

    Review was skipped due to path filters

    β›” Files ignored due to path filters (1)
    • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json

    CodeRabbit blocks several paths by default. You can override this behavior by explicitly including those paths in the path filters. For example, including **/dist/** will override the default block on the dist directory, by removing the pattern from both the lists.

    You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

    Walkthrough

    The .githooks/prepare-commit-msg script has been modified to enhance error handling and ensure the presence of a commit message file. Key changes include updating the shebang line, adding checks for the existence of a commit message file, implementing a backup mechanism for commit messages, and improving error handling during AI message generation. Additionally, the package.json file has had the @babel/plugin-proposal-private-property-in-object entry removed from the devDependencies, indicating a change in project dependencies.

    Changes

    File Change Summary
    .githooks/prepare-commit-msg - Updated shebang to #!/usr/bin/env sh
    - Added explicit checks for commit message file
    - Implemented backup mechanism for commit messages
    - Enhanced error handling for AI message generation
    - Improved file handling with quoted variables
    package.json - Removed @babel/plugin-proposal-private-property-in-object from devDependencies

    Suggested reviewers

    • gstraccini

    Poem

    🐰 A Git Hook's Tale of Grace 🐰

    In scripts where commit messages dance,
    A rabbit's wisdom takes its stance.
    With checks and guards, both sharp and bright,
    Ensuring messages take flight.
    Through AI's lens, with errors tamed,
    Our commit hook is now proclaimed!


    πŸͺ§ Tips

    Chat

    There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

    • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
      • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
      • Generate unit testing code for this file.
      • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
    • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
      • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
      • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
    • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
      • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
      • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
      • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
      • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

    Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

    CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

    • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
    • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
    • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
    • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
    • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
    • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
    • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
    • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
    • @coderabbitai help to get help.

    Other keywords and placeholders

    • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
    • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
    • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

    CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

    • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
    • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
    • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

    Documentation and Community

    • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
    • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
    • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

    @penify-dev penify-dev bot added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 6, 2025
    @github-actions github-actions bot added the size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. label Jan 6, 2025
    Copy link
    Contributor

    penify-dev bot commented Jan 6, 2025

    PR Review πŸ”

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]

    2, because the changes are mostly straightforward enhancements to the script with improved error handling and functionality.

    πŸ§ͺΒ Relevant tests

    No

    ⚑ Possible issues

    No

    πŸ”’Β Security concerns

    No

    Copy link

    @sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    Hey @guibranco - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

    Overall Comments:

    • Please provide the old and new version numbers and include a changelog or explanation of what changes necessitate this version bump.
    • The pull request appears to be missing the actual diff content showing the version changes. Please ensure all changes are properly included in the PR.
    • The automated note in the PR description should be removed and replaced with meaningful content about this change.
    Here's what I looked at during the review
    • 🟒 General issues: all looks good
    • 🟒 Security: all looks good
    • 🟒 Testing: all looks good
    • 🟒 Complexity: all looks good
    • 🟒 Documentation: all looks good

    Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
    Help me be more useful! Please click πŸ‘ or πŸ‘Ž on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

    Copy link

    socket-security bot commented Jan 6, 2025

    🚨 Potential security issues detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub β†—οΈŽ

    To accept the risk, merge this PR and you will not be notified again.

    Alert Package NoteSourceCI
    Debug access npm/@jest/[email protected] 🚫
    Dynamic require npm/@jest/[email protected] 🚫
    Debug access npm/@jest/[email protected] 🚫
    Environment variable access npm/@jest/[email protected] 🚫
    Environment variable access npm/[email protected] 🚫
    Dynamic require npm/[email protected] 🚫
    Dynamic require npm/[email protected] 🚫
    Dynamic require npm/[email protected] 🚫
    Dynamic require npm/[email protected] 🚫
    Dynamic require npm/[email protected] 🚫
    Dynamic require npm/[email protected] 🚫
    Environment variable access npm/[email protected] 🚫
    Environment variable access npm/[email protected] 🚫
    Uses eval npm/[email protected] 🚫
    Debug access npm/[email protected] 🚫
    Debug access npm/[email protected] 🚫
    Debug access npm/[email protected] 🚫
    Environment variable access npm/@testing-library/[email protected] 🚫
    Environment variable access npm/@testing-library/[email protected] 🚫
    Environment variable access npm/@testing-library/[email protected] 🚫
    Environment variable access npm/@testing-library/[email protected] 🚫
    Environment variable access npm/[email protected] 🚫
    Dynamic require npm/[email protected] 🚫
    Unstable ownership npm/[email protected] 🚫
    New author npm/[email protected] 🚫
    Environment variable access npm/@babel/[email protected] 🚫
    Environment variable access npm/@babel/[email protected] 🚫
    Trivial Package npm/@babel/[email protected] 🚫
    Debug access npm/[email protected] 🚫
    Filesystem access npm/[email protected] 🚫
    Unpopular package npm/@babel/[email protected] 🚫
    New author npm/[email protected] 🚫
    Environment variable access npm/@babel/[email protected] 🚫
    Unstable ownership npm/[email protected] 🚫

    View full reportβ†—οΈŽ

    Next steps

    What is debug access?

    Uses debug, reflection and dynamic code execution features.

    Removing the use of debug will reduce the risk of any reflection and dynamic code execution.

    What is dynamic require?

    Dynamic require can indicate the package is performing dangerous or unsafe dynamic code execution.

    Packages should avoid dynamic imports when possible. Audit the use of dynamic require to ensure it is not executing malicious or vulnerable code.

    What is environment variable access?

    Package accesses environment variables, which may be a sign of credential stuffing or data theft.

    Packages should be clear about which environment variables they access, and care should be taken to ensure they only access environment variables they claim to.

    What is dynamic code execution?

    Package uses dynamic code execution (e.g., eval()), which is a dangerous practice. This can prevent the code from running in certain environments and increases the risk that the code may contain exploits or malicious behavior.

    Avoid packages that use dynamic code execution like eval(), since this could potentially execute any code.

    What is unstable ownership?

    A new collaborator has begun publishing package versions. Package stability and security risk may be elevated.

    Try to reduce the number of authors you depend on to reduce the risk to malicious actors gaining access to your supply chain. Packages should remove inactive collaborators with publishing rights from packages on npm.

    What is new author?

    A new npm collaborator published a version of the package for the first time. New collaborators are usually benign additions to a project, but do indicate a change to the security surface area of a package.

    Scrutinize new collaborator additions to packages because they now have the ability to publish code into your dependency tree. Packages should avoid frequent or unnecessary additions or changes to publishing rights.

    What are trivial packages?

    Packages less than 10 lines of code are easily copied into your own project and may not warrant the additional supply chain risk of an external dependency.

    Removing this package as a dependency and implementing its logic will reduce supply chain risk.

    What is filesystem access?

    Accesses the file system, and could potentially read sensitive data.

    If a package must read the file system, clarify what it will read and ensure it reads only what it claims to. If appropriate, packages can leave file system access to consumers and operate on data passed to it instead.

    What are unpopular packages?

    This package is not very popular.

    Unpopular packages may have less maintenance and contain other problems.

    Take a deeper look at the dependency

    Take a moment to review the security alert above. Review the linked package source code to understand the potential risk. Ensure the package is not malicious before proceeding. If you're unsure how to proceed, reach out to your security team or ask the Socket team for help at support [AT] socket [DOT] dev.

    Remove the package

    If you happen to install a dependency that Socket reports as Known Malware you should immediately remove it and select a different dependency. For other alert types, you may may wish to investigate alternative packages or consider if there are other ways to mitigate the specific risk posed by the dependency.

    Mark a package as acceptable risk

    To ignore an alert, reply with a comment starting with @SocketSecurity ignore followed by a space separated list of ecosystem/package-name@version specifiers. e.g. @SocketSecurity ignore npm/[email protected] or ignore all packages with @SocketSecurity ignore-all

    Copy link
    Contributor

    penify-dev bot commented Jan 6, 2025

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    CategorySuggestionΒ  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Score
    Error handling
    Improve error handling by ensuring the backup file is removed in case of a write failure

    Ensure that the backup file is removed even if writing the new commit message fails.

    .githooks/prepare-commit-msg [53-54]

    -cp "${COMMIT_MSG_FILE}.bak" "$COMMIT_MSG_FILE"
    -rm "${COMMIT_MSG_FILE}.bak"
    +cp "${COMMIT_MSG_FILE}.bak" "$COMMIT_MSG_FILE" || rm "${COMMIT_MSG_FILE}.bak"
     
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

    Why: This suggestion improves error handling by ensuring that the backup file is removed in case of a write failure, which is crucial for preventing stale backup files.

    8
    Prevent potential errors by checking for the backup file's existence before removal

    Check for the existence of the backup file before attempting to remove it to avoid errors.

    .githooks/prepare-commit-msg [58-59]

    -rm "${COMMIT_MSG_FILE}.bak"
    +[ -f "${COMMIT_MSG_FILE}.bak" ] && rm "${COMMIT_MSG_FILE}.bak"
     
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6

    Why: This suggestion prevents potential errors by checking for the backup file's existence before removal, which is a reasonable improvement for error handling.

    6
    Maintainability
    Enhance script robustness by ensuring cleanup occurs on exit

    Consider using trap to ensure the backup file is removed in case of an unexpected exit.

    .githooks/prepare-commit-msg [58-59]

    -rm "${COMMIT_MSG_FILE}.bak"
    +trap 'rm -f "${COMMIT_MSG_FILE}.bak"' EXIT
     
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

    Why: Using trap enhances script robustness by ensuring cleanup occurs on exit, which is a good practice for maintaining a clean environment.

    7
    Best practice
    Improve command execution by using a subshell for capturing output

    Use a subshell to capture the output of the command to avoid potential issues with
    variable assignment.

    .githooks/prepare-commit-msg [39]

    +if ! AI_MESSAGE=$(dotnet-aicommitmessage generate-message -m "$CURRENT_MESSAGE" 2>/dev/null); then
     
    -
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5

    Why: While using a subshell can help with variable assignment, the current implementation already captures the output correctly, making this suggestion less critical.

    5

    Copy link

    socket-security bot commented Jan 6, 2025

    New and removed dependencies detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub β†—οΈŽ

    Package New capabilities Transitives Size Publisher

    View full reportβ†—οΈŽ

    Copy link

    github-actions bot commented Jan 6, 2025

    Infisical secrets check: βœ… No secrets leaked!

    πŸ’» Scan logs
    3:01AM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
    3:01AM INF 452 commits scanned.
    3:01AM INF scan completed in 1.14s
    3:01AM INF no leaks found
    

    Copy link

    sonarqubecloud bot commented Jan 6, 2025

    @guibranco guibranco disabled auto-merge January 6, 2025 03:06
    @guibranco guibranco merged commit e09ca4c into main Jan 6, 2025
    21 of 22 checks passed
    @guibranco guibranco deleted the feature/bump-version branch January 6, 2025 03:06
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    β˜‘οΈ auto-merge Automatic merging of pull requests (gstraccini-bot) enhancement New feature or request Review effort [1-5]: 2 size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files.
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    1 participant