Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update README.md #123

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 11, 2025
Merged

Update README.md #123

merged 2 commits into from
Jan 11, 2025

Conversation

guibranco
Copy link
Member

@guibranco guibranco commented Jan 11, 2025

User description

πŸ“‘ Description

Update README.md

βœ… Checks

  • My pull request adheres to the code style of this project
  • My code requires changes to the documentation
  • I have updated the documentation as required
  • All the tests have passed

☒️ Does this introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No


Description

  • Updated the Sonar Cloud badge link to reflect the correct workflow file name.

Changes walkthrough πŸ“

Relevant files
Documentation
README.md
Update Sonar Cloud Badge in READMEΒ  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β 

README.md

  • Updated the Sonar Cloud badge link in the README.
+1/-1Β  Β  Β 

πŸ’‘ Penify usage:
Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available Penify tools and their descriptions

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated Sonar Cloud badge URL in README to reflect changes in workflow file naming

Description by Korbit AI

What change is being made?

Update the Sonar Cloud badge URL in the README.md file to correct a typo in the file path for the sonar-cloud.yml workflow.

Why are these changes being made?

The previous URL had a typo, leading to a broken badge link. This change ensures the Sonar Cloud badge properly links to the correct workflow status, maintaining accurate and informative project documentation.

Is this description stale? Ask me to generate a new description by commenting /korbit-generate-pr-description

Copy link

The files' contents are under analysis for test generation.

Copy link

sourcery-ai bot commented Jan 11, 2025

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request updates the Sonar Cloud badge URL in the README.md file.

No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Update Sonar Cloud badge URL
  • The URL for the Sonar Cloud badge was updated from https://github.com/ApiBR/sports-agenda-ui/actions/workflows/sonarcloud.yml to https://github.com/ApiBR/sports-agenda-ui/actions/workflows/sonar-cloud.yml.
  • This change ensures that the Sonar Cloud badge correctly reflects the project's Sonar Cloud analysis status by linking to the correct workflow URL.
README.md

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use
    this command to specify where the summary should be inserted.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

@guibranco guibranco enabled auto-merge (squash) January 11, 2025 22:58
@gstraccini gstraccini bot added the β˜‘οΈ auto-merge Automatic merging of pull requests (gstraccini-bot) label Jan 11, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 11, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request involves a minor update to the README.md file, specifically changing the Sonar Cloud badge URL. The modification reflects an update in the GitHub Actions workflow file naming convention, replacing sonarcloud.yml with sonar-cloud.yml. This change ensures the badge correctly links to the updated workflow file name.

Changes

File Change Summary
README.md Updated Sonar Cloud badge URL from sonarcloud.yml to sonar-cloud.yml

Poem

🐰 A badge's path, once straight and true,
Shifted slightly, a workflow's new hue
From sonarcloud to sonar-cloud it springs
A tiny change that GitHub Actions brings
Precision in naming, rabbit's delight! πŸ›‘οΈ


πŸ“œ Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

πŸ“₯ Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1cfae70 and f7ece72.

πŸ“’ Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
βœ… Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • README.md
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: pixeebot[bot]
  • GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
  • GitHub Check: pixeebot[bot]

πŸͺ§ Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jan 11, 2025
Copy link

@korbit-ai korbit-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've completed my review and didn't find any issues.

Need a new review? Comment /korbit-review on this PR and I'll review your latest changes.

Korbit Guide: Usage and Customization

Interacting with Korbit

  • You can manually ask Korbit to review your PR using the /korbit-review command in a comment at the root of your PR.
  • You can ask Korbit to generate a new PR description using the /korbit-generate-pr-description command in any comment on your PR.
  • Too many Korbit comments? I can resolve all my comment threads if you use the /korbit-resolve command in any comment on your PR.
  • Chat with Korbit on issues we post by tagging @korbit-ai in your reply.
  • Help train Korbit to improve your reviews by giving a πŸ‘ or πŸ‘Ž on the comments Korbit posts.

Customizing Korbit

  • Check out our docs on how you can make Korbit work best for you and your team.
  • Customize Korbit for your organization through the Korbit Console.

Current Korbit Configuration

General Settings ​
Setting Value
Review Schedule Automatic excluding drafts
Max Issue Count 10
Automatic PR Descriptions βœ…
Issue Categories ​
Category Enabled
Naming βœ…
Database Operations βœ…
Documentation βœ…
Logging βœ…
Error Handling βœ…
Systems and Environment βœ…
Objects and Data Structures βœ…
Readability and Maintainability βœ…
Asynchronous Processing βœ…
Design Patterns βœ…
Third-Party Libraries βœ…
Performance βœ…
Security βœ…
Functionality βœ…

Feedback and Support

Note

Korbit Pro is free for open source projects πŸŽ‰

Looking to add Korbit to your team? Get started with a free 2 week trial here

@penify-dev penify-dev bot added the Review effort [1-5]: 1 Minimal review effort required for this pull request (effort level: 1) label Jan 11, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

penify-dev bot commented Jan 11, 2025

PR Review πŸ”

⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]

1, because the changes are minimal and straightforward, involving only a single line update in the README file.

πŸ§ͺΒ Relevant tests

No

⚑ Possible issues

No

πŸ”’Β Security concerns

No

Copy link
Contributor

penify-dev bot commented Jan 11, 2025

PR Code Suggestions ✨

CategorySuggestionΒ  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Score
Possible issue
Correct the Sonar Cloud badge URL to ensure it points to the right workflow

The badge URL for Sonar Cloud should match the correct path to ensure it displays the
correct status.

README.md [4]

-[![Sonar Cloud](https://github.com/ApiBR/sports-agenda-ui/actions/workflows/sonar-cloud.yml/badge.svg)](https://github.com/ApiBR/sports-agenda-ui/actions/workflows/sonar-cloud.yml)
+[![Sonar Cloud](https://github.com/ApiBR/sports-agenda-ui/actions/workflows/sonarcloud.yml/badge.svg)](https://github.com/ApiBR/sports-agenda-ui/actions/workflows/sonarcloud.yml)
 
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

Why: The suggestion correctly identifies that the Sonar Cloud badge URL needs to match the correct path to display the status accurately, which is important for maintaining the project's CI/CD visibility.

8

Copy link

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @guibranco - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

Overall Comments:

  • Please clean up the PR description by removing the placeholder note about writing a description.
Here's what I looked at during the review
  • 🟒 General issues: all looks good
  • 🟒 Security: all looks good
  • 🟒 Testing: all looks good
  • 🟒 Complexity: all looks good
  • 🟒 Documentation: all looks good

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click πŸ‘ or πŸ‘Ž on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

Copy link

Infisical secrets check: βœ… No secrets leaked!

πŸ’» Scan logs
11:43PM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
11:43PM INF 80 commits scanned.
11:43PM INF scan completed in 75.8ms
11:43PM INF no leaks found

@guibranco guibranco merged commit 3dfb851 into main Jan 11, 2025
24 of 25 checks passed
@guibranco guibranco deleted the guibranco-patch-1 branch January 11, 2025 23:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
β˜‘οΈ auto-merge Automatic merging of pull requests (gstraccini-bot) documentation Review effort [1-5]: 1 Minimal review effort required for this pull request (effort level: 1) size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant