Create .htaccess

[guibranco]

User description

📑 Description

Create .htaccess

✅ Checks

• My pull request adheres to the code style of this project
• My code requires changes to the documentation
• I have updated the documentation as required
• All the tests have passed

☢️ Does this introduce a breaking change?

• Yes
• No

Note

I'm currently writing a description for your pull request. I should be done shortly (<1 minute). Please don't edit the description field until I'm finished, or we may overwrite each other. If I find nothing to write about, I'll delete this message.

---

Description

• Introduced a new .htaccess file to manage URL redirection and fallback.
• Redirects all traffic to https://apibr.com unless the host is already set.
• Ensures that requests for non-existent files are served by index.html.

---

Changes walkthrough 📝

	Relevant files
Enhancement	.htaccess Implement URL redirection and fallback in .htaccess            public/.htaccess Added rewrite rules for URL redirection. Configured to redirect to https://apibr.com. Set up fallback to index.html for non-file requests. +7/-0

---

💡 Penify usage:
Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available Penify tools and their descriptions

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features
  • Added server configuration to enforce secure HTTPS domain
  • Implemented routing support for single-page application
  • Configured automatic redirection to primary domain

[code-genius-code-coverage]

The files' contents are under analysis for test generation.

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request introduces a new .htaccess file to the public directory.

No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Created a new .htaccess file	Added rules for URL rewriting and redirection Configured access control for specific files and directories	public/.htaccess

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use
  this command to specify where the summary should be inserted.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[coderabbitai]

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a new .htaccess configuration file in the public/ directory. This configuration enables URL rewriting for the web server, implementing two key rules: a domain redirection mechanism that ensures all traffic is routed to https://apibr.com, and a routing rule that directs non-file requests to index.html. These changes support single-page application behavior and enforce secure HTTPS connections.

Changes

File	Change Summary
public/.htaccess	Added Apache rewrite configuration for domain redirection and SPA routing

Poem

🐰 Hop, hop, through the web's domain,
Rewriting rules with digital refrain,
HTTPS secure, paths align just right,
Single-page magic takes its flight,
A rabbit's config, smooth and neat! 🌐

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 647ddb8 and 23751d9.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• public/.htaccess (1 hunks)

---

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[sourcery-ai]

Hey @guibranco - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

Overall Comments:

• This PR creates an empty .htaccess file which serves no purpose. Please include the actual Apache configuration rules you intend to implement.
• The PR description is incomplete (still shows the placeholder message). Please provide a proper description of the changes and their purpose.
• You've marked that documentation changes were required and made, but no documentation changes are included in this PR. Please clarify or correct this discrepancy.

Here's what I looked at during the review

• 🟢 General issues: all looks good
• 🟢 Security: all looks good
• 🟢 Testing: all looks good
• 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
• 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}

[penify-dev]

PR Review 🔍

⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]	2, because the changes are straightforward and involve standard rewrite rules in an .htaccess file.
🧪 Relevant tests	No
⚡ Possible issues	No
🔒 Security concerns	No

[korbit-ai]

I've completed my review and didn't find any issues.

Need a new review? Comment /korbit-review on this PR and I'll review your latest changes.

Korbit Guide: Usage and Customization

Interacting with Korbit

• You can manually ask Korbit to review your PR using the /korbit-review command in a comment at the root of your PR.
• You can ask Korbit to generate a new PR description using the /korbit-generate-pr-description command in any comment on your PR.
• Too many Korbit comments? I can resolve all my comment threads if you use the /korbit-resolve command in any comment on your PR.
• Chat with Korbit on issues we post by tagging @korbit-ai in your reply.
• Help train Korbit to improve your reviews by giving a 👍 or 👎 on the comments Korbit posts.

Customizing Korbit

• Check out our docs on how you can make Korbit work best for you and your team.
• Customize Korbit for your organization through the Korbit Console.

Current Korbit Configuration

General Settings

​

Setting	Value
Review Schedule	Automatic excluding drafts
Max Issue Count	10
Automatic PR Descriptions	✅

Issue Categories

​

Category	Enabled
Naming	✅
Database Operations	✅
Documentation	✅
Logging	✅
Error Handling	✅
Systems and Environment	✅
Objects and Data Structures	✅
Readability and Maintainability	✅
Asynchronous Processing	✅
Design Patterns	✅
Third-Party Libraries	✅
Performance	✅
Security	✅
Functionality	✅

Feedback and Support

• Tell us what you think of Korbit
• Schedule a call with our team
• Email us @ [email protected]

Note

Korbit Pro is free for open source projects 🎉

Looking to add Korbit to your team? Get started with a free 2 week trial here

[github-actions]

Infisical secrets check: ✅ No secrets leaked!

💻 Scan logs

1:28AM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
1:28AM INF 70 commits scanned.
1:28AM INF scan completed in 84.4ms
1:28AM INF no leaks found

[penify-dev]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Category	Suggestion	Score
Security	Add a check for the HTTPS protocol before redirecting to ensure secure connections Consider adding a condition to check for the HTTPS protocol to ensure that the redirection only occurs if the request is not already secure. public/.htaccess [3-4] +RewriteCond %{HTTPS} off RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^apibr\.com$ RewriteRule ^(.*)$ "https\:\/\/apibr\.com\/$1" [R=301,L] Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9 Why: This suggestion addresses a crucial security concern by ensuring that redirection only occurs for non-secure requests, which is important for maintaining secure connections.	9
Best practice	Include a trailing slash in the RewriteRule to ensure proper URL handling It is advisable to include a trailing slash in the RewriteRule to avoid potential issues with URL handling. public/.htaccess [4] -RewriteRule ^(.*)$ "https\:\/\/apibr\.com\/$1" [R=301,L] +RewriteRule ^(.*)$ "https\:\/\/apibr\.com\/$1/" [R=301,L] Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5 Why: While including a trailing slash can help with URL handling, it is not critical for functionality and may depend on the specific application requirements.	5
Maintainability	Add comments to clarify the purpose of each rewrite rule for better maintainability Consider adding comments to explain the purpose of each rewrite rule for better maintainability and clarity. public/.htaccess [6-7] +# Check if the requested file does not exist RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f +# Redirect to index.html if the file is not found RewriteRule ^ index.html [QSA,L] Suggestion importance[1-10]: 4 Why: Adding comments improves code readability and maintainability, but the absence of comments does not affect the functionality of the rewrite rules.	4
	Move the RewriteEngine directive to the top of the file for better organization Ensure that the RewriteEngine directive is placed at the top of the file for better readability and organization. public/.htaccess [1] +# RewriteEngine on RewriteEngine on Suggestion importance[1-10]: 3 Why: Moving the RewriteEngine directive to the top is a matter of style and organization, but it does not impact the functionality of the code.	3

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud