-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[RFC] Community-powered Resume Review Portal #301
Comments
I guess the design only shows the original PDF on the left as it is, without parsing, right? |
Yep, we will leave the resume as is so the reviewer can also see the style, font, etc of the original resume and provide feedback in those areas
We will leave those sections hardcoded for now but going into the future, we aim to make it dynamic. It will require some tinkering with PDF.js to get the sections right all the time since parsing PDFs can be a tricky affair.
We are using PostgreSQL to store the resume metadata (date uploaded, etc) and comments. We are still thinking over the options for storing the resume, whether we store it in the database as well or find a dedicated storage provider. Hope we answered your questions :) |
The interface is minimal and neat. I am happy to see that the jobseeker does not need to manually fill up a bunch of forms before getting comments (unlike applying for jobs). If you want some technical depth in the implementation you can also consider designing some heuristics to decide which resumes to show in the front page and in what order. Similar current solutions include posting on Reddit (generic resumes, generic engineering, tech resumes) Some questions and proposals
|
Yep!
We plan to give them the flexibility to have more than 1 page since the standards may differ based on different locations they are applying to. It helps to accommodate our users who come from different parts of the world.
Yep! We can make it work with PDF.js
This is a very good suggestion! Thank you :) |
One thing I found out with PDF resume submissions is that it is common to find that information is not properly redacted (e.g. changing the hyperlink text but not redacting the hyperlink link). I think it is a better privacy measure to accept only image submissions instead. Probably it is not that common to find commenters citing text and commenting. You might want to consider OCR, but that would be after the platform has gained traction. |
We are a group of 4 students from Singapore that is thinking of contributing a resume review portal to the handbook.
The portal will be an extension of Tech Interview Handbook (TIH). It will allow software engineers to get feedback on their resumes from the community. Users will upload their resume for review and voluntary reviewers can leave their comments on different sections of the resume.
Below are our proposed features, feel free to share any feedback you feel will improve the benefit of using this portal for both reviewers and uploaders!
For the resume review portal, we have 3 key functionalities:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: