-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Push negative fraction weirdness into LCM #27
Labels
bug
Something isn't working
Comments
frostburn
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 20, 2024
Replicate something similar for radicand analogues. Fix zero fraction normalization. ref #27
frostburn
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 20, 2024
Extend gcd and lcm to bigints. Replicate something similar for radicand analogues. Fix zero fraction normalization. ref #27
frostburn
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 20, 2024
Replicate something similar for radical/radicand analogues. Extend gcd, lcm and mmod to bigints. Fix zero fraction normalization. ref #27
Turns out truncation towards zero has even stranger consequences for |
frostburn
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 20, 2024
Replicate something similar for radical/radicand analogues. Extend gcd, lcm and mmod to bigints. Fix zero fraction normalization. ref #27
frostburn
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 21, 2024
Replicate something similar for radical/radicand analogues. Extend gcd, lcm and mmod to bigints. Fix zero fraction normalization. ref #27
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
The identity
a * b = lcm(a, b) * gcd(a, b)
is nice even if negative numbers are a bit non-sensical.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: