Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Equave raise/drop considered hazardous? #331

Open
frostburn opened this issue May 23, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Equave raise/drop considered hazardous? #331

frostburn opened this issue May 23, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@frostburn
Copy link
Member

ask me for EDO reccs > 31Today at 6:40 PM

do you use backticks in the language?

frostburnToday at 6:40 PM

Not yet. Might use them like XenPaper for equave drops.

ask me for EDO reccs > 31Today at 6:40 PM

i think that's sort of a bad idea honestly cuz i think they look too similar
also cuz then u need to use ' for equave raise which seems very problematic
another reason is that this leads to counterintuitive notation imo
like when you think "ok what's a major third below the major second in 31 EDO" you think "5 - 10" so you think it should be (backtick)5 but that's wrong cuz it should be (backtick)26
i know it has advantages in some situations but i think it's more intuitive to preserve negatives being the negative of positives
the most important advantage is easily revoicing chords
either way i think it shouldnt use ` and ' for the reasons above

@frostburn frostburn added the question Further information is requested label May 23, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant