You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks for writing this. I stumbled on this guide and it's similar to something I'd been thinking of!
An alternative to using wireguard to forward one port might be the HAProxy proxy protocol:
The Proxy Protocol was designed to chain proxies / reverse-proxies without losing the client information.
A proxy will use its own IP stack to get connected on remote servers. Because of this, we lose the initial TCP connection information like source and destination IP and port when a proxy in involved in an architecture.
No OS-level setup needed; it's a matter of making sure a TCP stream lands at its destination, this can be through ssh forward, stunnel, tor, or other means.
It's just one port. Not more, not less.
Disadvantages to wireguard:
Needs special support in the receiving service (c-lightning in this case).
Not encrypted by default. Stream needs wrapping to be secure over the internet.
Does not automatically route outgoing traffic. This may be the biggest problem.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for writing this. I stumbled on this guide and it's similar to something I'd been thinking of!
An alternative to using wireguard to forward one port might be the HAProxy proxy protocol:
Advantages to wireguard:
Disadvantages to wireguard:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: