Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

No Attribute Mapping for Condition #2591

Open
BioHazardousX opened this issue Sep 6, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

No Attribute Mapping for Condition #2591

BioHazardousX opened this issue Sep 6, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
needs feedback The issue/PR needs a response from any of the parties involved in the issue. type: enhancement The issue is a request for an enhancement.

Comments

@BioHazardousX
Copy link

Describe the bug:

See support ticket:
https://wordpress.org/support/topic/no-attribute-mapping-for-condition/#post-17999547

Condition needs to be able to be mapped like other attribute rules. There are definitely scenarios where a product can have all 3 options, New, Used, and Refurbished. The workaround provided doesn't work for items with more than one option for Condition. This seems like an oversight with the development of this particular product attribute, so I'm listing it as a bug and not a feature request as the feature is there, it just doesn't work like it should.

Steps to reproduce:

  1. Go to create an attribute rule
  2. Select Condition
  3. No option present to map to an Attribute

Expected behavior:

It needs to be able to be mapped to an attribute

Actual behavior:

You can only apply one to all products or by category, which doesn't work for products with options.

Additional details:

https://wordpress.org/support/topic/no-attribute-mapping-for-condition/#post-17999547

@tomalec tomalec added the type: enhancement The issue is a request for an enhancement. label Sep 30, 2024
@tomalec
Copy link
Member

tomalec commented Sep 30, 2024

Hi @BioHazardousX, thanks for your request. I'm marking it as an enhancement, as from the perspective of this extension, it behaves as expected when we initially designed it.

Could you describe in more detail what is the exact flow in which you would like to set it up for your case?

@tomalec tomalec added the needs feedback The issue/PR needs a response from any of the parties involved in the issue. label Sep 30, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
needs feedback The issue/PR needs a response from any of the parties involved in the issue. type: enhancement The issue is a request for an enhancement.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants