You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Last issue from me for today, sorry to keep it coming.
When using weight with stat_binline, a warning states that this aesthetic is ignored. Nevertheless, the output changes, which makes sense since stat_bin supports weights. Now I am not sure whether I can ignore that warning - if so, should the warning be removed?
library(ggridges)
library(ggplot2)
ggplot(mtcars, aes(x=mpg, y=factor(am)))+geom_density_ridges(stat="binline", aes(weight=cyl))
#> Warning: Ignoring unknown aesthetics: weight#> `stat_binline()` using `bins = 30`. Pick better value with `binwidth`.
ggplot(mtcars, aes(x=mpg, y=factor(am)))+geom_density_ridges(stat="binline")
#> `stat_binline()` using `bins = 30`. Pick better value with `binwidth`.
Honestly I have no idea what is happening here. I would recommend making a simpler example so you can examine whether the weights are actually applied correctly or not.
Last issue from me for today, sorry to keep it coming.
When using
weight
withstat_binline
, a warning states that this aesthetic is ignored. Nevertheless, the output changes, which makes sense sincestat_bin
supports weights. Now I am not sure whether I can ignore that warning - if so, should the warning be removed?Created on 2022-02-09 by the reprex package (v2.0.1)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: