Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add discussion of use of term "stakeholder" to ethics paper #53

Open
ethanwhite opened this issue Oct 3, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Add discussion of use of term "stakeholder" to ethics paper #53

ethanwhite opened this issue Oct 3, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@ethanwhite
Copy link
Member

We've removed the use of the term "stakeholder" generally from our materials following on discussions like this:
https://www.fasttrackimpact.com/post/why-we-shouldn-t-banish-the-word-stakeholder?postId=1a6b9631-56a5-416e-a796-86d6dfb30d87

However it features so prominently in the paper we read on ecological forecasting ethics it can't simply be avoided. It seems appropriate to add a brief discussion of the ethics related this term in the context of the lesson.

ethanwhite added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 3, 2023
This term is increasingly being reconsidered in light of it's negative
historical usage. See, e.g.,

* https://www.fasttrackimpact.com/post/why-we-shouldn-t-banish-the-word-stakeholder?postId=1a6b9631-56a5-416e-a796-86d6dfb30d87
* https://researchimpact.ca/featured/switching-from-stakeholder/

This replaces the usage for all but the Ethics material, where the word
is actively used throughout the reading. An issue has been opened to
address if more actively there:

#53
ethanwhite added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 3, 2023
This term is increasingly being reconsidered in light of it's negative
historical usage. See, e.g.,

* https://www.fasttrackimpact.com/post/why-we-shouldn-t-banish-the-word-stakeholder?postId=1a6b9631-56a5-416e-a796-86d6dfb30d87
* https://researchimpact.ca/featured/switching-from-stakeholder/

This replaces the usage for all but the Ethics material, where the word
is actively used throughout the reading. An issue has been opened to
address if more actively there:

#53

Thanks to the Ecological Forecasting Initiative DEI group, for
their discussion that precipitated this change.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant