You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the formal semantics document the actions have two states (not-performed/performed), IMHO, it would be also interesting to specify who is responsible of performing that action; the system, a requester, and external actor/system, etc.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Futhermore, depending on the scenario, there could be even more states that are relevant to that given action such as the deontic state.
For that purpose, @besteves4 and I have created the ODRL compliance report model .
It allows to represent the states over a rule and action.
With the model, I can express that a permission rule was active, the action is performed and thus the deontic state is Fulfilled.
As a permission report has properties to link to the request and the odrl:Permission rule, the party that attempted a certain request can easily be retrieved.
Furthermore, policy reports could be used as representation of executed actions in the state of the world (see #61).
In the formal semantics document the actions have two states (not-performed/performed), IMHO, it would be also interesting to specify who is responsible of performing that action; the system, a requester, and external actor/system, etc.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: