You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Using this library in an otherwise empty document increases the compilation time from ~1 s to ~4 s on my computer, which is understandable from the large number of lists, but also a bit painful, and its bound to get worse if my feature request #1 is implemented ;-).
Maybe the library could be split up into sublibraries, or the list definitions could be provided in separate files and the colormap and cycle list name keys patched to only load the definitions when required.
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{pgfplots}
\usepgfplotslibrary{colorbrewer} % ~4 s to compile with this included, ~1 s to compile with this commented out
\begin{document}
\end{document}
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yes, that would indeed be good. Unfortunately, I have no idea how to load the definitions only when they are being used, so if you have a suggestion for doing so, that would be more than welcome! Otherwise, I could indeed make different files for all the different colorschemes for example, but I considerd that to be a bit of overkill. Perhaps at least splitting in the different types of colorschemes (for TikZ and different ones for the different PGF possibilities) might be an indea.
Using this library in an otherwise empty document increases the compilation time from ~1 s to ~4 s on my computer, which is understandable from the large number of lists, but also a bit painful, and its bound to get worse if my feature request #1 is implemented
;-)
.Maybe the library could be split up into sublibraries, or the list definitions could be provided in separate files and the
colormap
andcycle list name
keys patched to only load the definitions when required.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: