You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The version constraint == will introduce the risk of dependency conflicts because the scope of dependencies is too strict.
The version constraint No Upper Bound and * will introduce the risk of the missing API Error because the latest version of the dependencies may remove some APIs.
After further analysis, in this project,
The version constraint of dependency requests can be changed to >=0.8.0,<=2.24.0.
The version constraint of dependency requests can be changed to ==2.26.0.
The version constraint of dependency CacheControl can be changed to >=0.12.0,<=0.12.12.
The above modification suggestions can reduce the dependency conflicts as much as possible,
and introduce the latest version as much as possible without calling Error in the projects.
The invocation of the current project includes all the following methods.
Hi, In neo4j-rest-client, inappropriate dependency versioning constraints can cause risks.
Below are the dependencies and version constraints that the project is using
The version constraint == will introduce the risk of dependency conflicts because the scope of dependencies is too strict.
The version constraint No Upper Bound and * will introduce the risk of the missing API Error because the latest version of the dependencies may remove some APIs.
After further analysis, in this project,
The version constraint of dependency requests can be changed to >=0.8.0,<=2.24.0.
The version constraint of dependency requests can be changed to ==2.26.0.
The version constraint of dependency CacheControl can be changed to >=0.12.0,<=0.12.12.
The above modification suggestions can reduce the dependency conflicts as much as possible,
and introduce the latest version as much as possible without calling Error in the projects.
The invocation of the current project includes all the following methods.
The calling methods from the requests
The calling methods from the CacheControl
The calling methods from the all methods
@developer
Could please help me check this issue?
May I pull a request to fix it?
Thank you very much.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: