-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feedback on outline: include policy frameworks that can be conducive to DPGs #20
Comments
+1 to this. Thank you, @sunitagrote. |
One of the questions we're going to have to decide about is to whether procurement policy goes in the Procurement Module or the Policy Module. So far, I've mostly decided in favor of the former, with pointers from the latter where appropriate. This means that the Policy Module focuses more on policy concepts and on a few very high-level policy recommendations, and then refers out to other modules for topic-specific policy details. That feels like a reasonable solution to me, so far, but I'd welcome others' thoughts on it -- either now or later after more of the material is in place. |
Just dropping this here re India: https://opensource.com/government/15/8/india-adopts-open-source-policy |
We did address this in the Policy section. I'll leave this issue open though until we confirm it was address well enough. |
Section on Procurement: would suggest also including policy frameworks that can be conducive to DPGs - example from India for instance, that requires any public procurement to show that no open source alternative is available if a proprietary one is procured
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: