You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is probably not a bug, but I found the behavior unintuitive when working on the source code that generated the constraint. Maybe we can improve the implementation of scrape to handle this case.
I have a code in Flux with an assert like this: assert(i < 10 && i >= 2). The code generates the following constraint that requires the qualifier x >= 2, but scrape=both fails to find it.
This is probably not a bug, but I found the behavior unintuitive when working on the source code that generated the constraint. Maybe we can improve the implementation of scrape to handle this case.
I have a code in Flux with an assert like this:
assert(i < 10 && i >= 2)
. The code generates the following constraint that requires the qualifierx >= 2
, butscrape=both
fails to find it.If I simplify the assert to
assert(x >= 2)
(or I split the assert in two), scrape does work. This is the constraint for the simplified assert.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: