Shared X25519_PRIVATE_KEY for Development

[0x4007]

Can somebody work on generating a new X25519_PRIVATE_KEY for the ubiquibot organization? We need to share it for development purposes.

1. Generate a new key
2. Encrypt a new evmPrivateKeyEncrypted (no funds!) and add to the org bot config
3. Add the shared test key to the comment-incentives readme.

567419d

Originally posted by @pavlovcik in #19 (comment)

[molecula451]

pavlovcik i think we need to update a bit the readme

dm what to whom?

[0x4007]

Link below for conversation context. It was to me. Anyways you need to create a new private key for this task!

[gitcoindev]

/start

[ubiquibot]

Deadline	Fri, Feb 16, 6:45 PM UTC
Registered Wallet	0x7e92476D69Ff1377a8b45176b1829C4A5566653a

Tips:

• Use /wallet 0x0000...0000 if you want to update your registered payment wallet address.
• Be sure to open a draft pull request as soon as possible to communicate updates on your progress.
• Be sure to provide timely updates to us when requested, or you will be automatically unassigned from the task.

[molecula451]

let us know when done

[ubiquibot]

+ Evaluating results. Please wait...

[molecula451]

https://github.com/ubiquibot/comment-incentives/actions/runs/7935268560 invalid input sounds unexpected @gitcoindev ??

[ubiquibot]

+ Evaluating results. Please wait...

[0x4007]

https://github.com/ubiquibot/comment-incentives/actions/runs/7935268560 invalid input sounds unexpected @gitcoindev ??

In the repository secrets I think I need to change the key to match @gitcoindev's

[0x4007]

I just changed it to 627H-BcWbcp_O3YmQGIA6MqgxVsFuplFCA9DK3iC7GQ

I hope that it doesn't break production for some reason (it should get it from Netlify secrets, but not sure if we implemented this correctly!)

I fear that we might need to build a feature for this to support development key pair and production. Unfortunately I'm already winding down for the day so I'll leave you guys to try and investigate.

[gitcoindev]

@molecula451 I tried to override X25519_PRIVATE_KEY but it did not help. It seems that https://github.com/ubiquibot/production/blob/1937a6ba75588f51d1bf07fed1f6384f79090465/.github/ubiquibot-config.yml#L2 takes precedence over https://github.com/ubiquibot/comment-incentives/blob/main/.github/ubiquibot-config.yml#L2 (I see the first one in logs).

[ubiquibot]

+ Evaluating results. Please wait...

[ubiquibot]

+ Evaluating results. Please wait...

[ubiquibot]

[ 43.8 WXDAI ]

@pavlovcik

Contributions Overview

View	Contribution	Count	Reward
Issue	Specification	1	17.4
Issue	Comment	3	22.6
Review	Comment	2	3.8

Conversation Incentives

Comment	Formatting	Relevance	Reward
Can somebody work on generating a new `X25519_PRIVATE_KEY` for t...	17.4 li: count: 3 score: "3" words: 31 code: count: 3 score: "3" words: 4	1	17.4
Link below for conversation context. It was to me. Anyways you n...	4.2	0.05	4.2
> https://github.com/ubiquibot/comment-incentives/actions/runs/7...	3.2	0.78	3.2
I just changed it to `627H-BcWbcp_O3YmQGIA6MqgxVsFuplFCA9DK3iC7G...	15.2 code: count: 1 score: "1" words: 2	0.72	15.2
Need to document a private key too ...	1.4	0.49	1.4
I was editing this right now but was too slow to push....	2.4	0.37	2.4

[ 5.3 WXDAI ]

@molecula451

Contributions Overview

View	Contribution	Count	Reward
Issue	Comment	3	3.4
Review	Comment	2	1.9

Conversation Incentives

Comment	Formatting	Relevance	Reward
pavlovcik i think we need to update a bit the readme ![image_...	1.5	0.68	1.5
let us know when done...	0.5	1	0.5
https://github.com/ubiquibot/comment-incentives/actions/runs/793...	1.4	0.525	1.4
indeed...	0.1	0.43	0.1
go to go pavlovick, we'll be using this one for test only or tes...	1.8	0.39	1.8

[ 47.4 WXDAI ]

@gitcoindev

Contributions Overview

View	Contribution	Count	Reward
Issue	Task	1.00	37.5
Issue	Comment	1	0
Issue	Comment	1	4.9
Review	Comment	2	2.5
Review	Comment	2	2.5

Conversation Incentives

Comment	Formatting	Relevance	Reward
@molecula451 I tried to override X25519_PRIVATE_KEY but it did n...	-	0.605	-
@molecula451 I tried to override X25519_PRIVATE_KEY but it did n...	4.9	0.605	4.9
@pavlovcik @molecula451 please check now again, I added to docs....	1	0.75	1
No way, full details are available in plain sight, only for test...	1.5	0.5	1.5
@pavlovcik @molecula451 please check now again, I added to docs....	1	0.75	1
No way, full details are available in plain sight, only for test...	1.5	0.5	1.5

[molecula451]

@pavlovcik permitted with hard debug (tho no funds in the private key)

[0x4007]

@pavlovcik permitted with hard debug (tho no funds in the private key)

I don't understand what you mean by this

[molecula451]

pavlovcik i re-generated the X25519 to trigger the permit, what you don't understand? using a private key i own, but also did many commits to reach the root cause

[0x4007]

I'll investigate more on my computer later.

[molecula451]

sure thing

[0x4007]

Will it be an issue if I revert to the commit and secret that I had before?

It was the production x25519 key in the GitHub repository secrets when it was working like eight hours ago.

Posting this message before checking on my computer to get you before you log off.