You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 1, 2022. It is now read-only.
conceivably, tabindex could also be any valid number >= 0 (but not tabindex="-1") ... not sure that can be fully expressed with CSS selectors though, so perhaps just [tabindex] (knowing that it "may" catch some invalid combos) would be sufficient...
other edge case could be something that acts as a link, but wants to be visually styled as a button (like a call to action that actually opens a new page)...this would have a role="link" (and JS which when ENTER is pressed would the window's location...again, lots of faffing)
i do wonder if at these stages (where authors explicitly do some very intensive work to use a <span> or similar rather than just a <button> or <a href...>), they may also understand the limitations of the linter...but hey it wouldn't harm either way, as we're just covering edge cases i guess
cvrebert
changed the title
Allow .btn on [role="button"][tabindex="0"]
Allow .btn on [role="button"] with tabindex which ≠ -1
Jan 16, 2016
cvrebert
changed the title
Allow .btn on [role="button"] with tabindex which ≠ -1
Allow .btn on [role="button"],[role="link"] with tabindex which ≠ -1
Jan 16, 2016
not sure that can be fully expressed with CSS selectors though
No worries, we don't have that limitation. We try to express the constraints using selectors where possible, but we're okay with dropping down to JS when necessary.
Refs #313.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: