You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 15, 2019. It is now read-only.
This is a feature request, I have more as a matter of fact, will open them separately.
Consider the following scenario:
reacting to someone insulting people; select offending text, press reply
the reply box opens with the offending text already quoted
activating the appropriate macro will overwrite the initially existing text; that needs to be copy/pasted in the macro dialog box.
This could be avoided if the macro text would be inserted after the existing text in the reply box, rather than overwriting the existing comments.This is a feature request, I have more as a matter of fact, will open them separately.
Consider the following scenario:
reacting to someone insulting people; select offending text, press reply
the reply box opens with the offending text already quoted
activating the appropriate macro will overwrite the initially existing text; that needs to be copy/pasted in the macro dialog box.
This could be avoided if the macro text would be inserted after the existing text in the reply box, rather than overwriting the existing comments.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hmm, maybe we could introduce a token for any text that's already in the reply box? That way you could set macros up to include that text wherever it's relevant, and you could type out the custom part before confirming the rest of the macro.
Would probably end up extending info around macros.js:433 - maybe name the new token something like replytext, could just insert something like:
Hrm, that is true. It might indeed be more appropriate in the macro itself.
I am not even sure it should be a token to be honest, maybe "prepend/append text from textarea" as a button. Though rereading the use case he can probably simply use {body} as token most of the times.
Ah well... Let's go for a token at first in the macro module itself it is simplest thing to do.
Eh, if you're quoting multiple lines of the body, just doing
{body}
wouldn't work because it would only quote the first line and have the rest
trailing off. So for this specific case, it makes sense to let Reddit do
the quoting and then insert that.
I do like the idea of adding a button though - we could even make it
"insert at current cursor position" or something so there's easier control
over it.
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
This is a feature request, I have more as a matter of fact, will open them separately.
Consider the following scenario:
This could be avoided if the macro text would be inserted after the existing text in the reply box, rather than overwriting the existing comments.This is a feature request, I have more as a matter of fact, will open them separately.
Consider the following scenario:
This could be avoided if the macro text would be inserted after the existing text in the reply box, rather than overwriting the existing comments.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: