You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Actually, I have an update on this issue. I tested the new version on a few different data sets. Most of them come out essentially the same, but there is one data set that produced very different results.
This is the result with 2.12:
And this is the with the GitHub version:
The first one is roughly what one would expect and the second one is not. I tried subsampling the number of cells. I am showing 5000 cells above. Reducing it to 4500 yielded a plot that looks normal with both versions, so it seems like the input data is mostly okay.
Do you know what may be causing this?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We have to figure out if this is a bug in my new logic from 1008274 or an effect of the switch to RSpectra in b4e8dad. There were no other relevant changes since then.
Please check if it’s a logic bug by installing a version doesn’t have the logic change and test there, i.e. devtools::install_github('theislab/destiny', ref='fbf6f29b4f3eab54095b2c96da27173619babc52')
Please check if it’s a random thing by trying several seeds before recreating the diffusion map: set.seed(1), set.seed(2), …
Due to the subsampling making a difference, I suspect that the data just gives unstable results, and using different seeds might make a difference.
@igordot wrote:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: