You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When using the destiny implementation of diffusion maps, we observed that eigenvalues obtained were decreasing, starting from the first index to the last. Have the values been altered (additively inverted)? I'm used to seeing the leading eigenvalue have the smallest value second to the zero values, and am having a hard time interpreting the meaning of the eigenvalues returned by eigenvalues(dm).
Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
That’s curious, the most popular numerical spectral decomposition algorithm (Arnoldi/Lanczos) is used everywhere in its ARPACK implementation. Scipy, igraph, MATLAB, you name it.
And that algorithm is best at finding extremal eigenvalues. Every single one of those popular libraries should give you the largest-magnitude eigenvalues by default and warn you that finding the small ones will be slow and maybe won’t converge.
So where did you see those unusual small eigenvalues?
PS: check out the text below eqn. 9 here for interpretation of the eigenvalues. lower = noisier
When using the
destiny
implementation of diffusion maps, we observed that eigenvalues obtained were decreasing, starting from the first index to the last. Have the values been altered (additively inverted)? I'm used to seeing the leading eigenvalue have the smallest value second to the zero values, and am having a hard time interpreting the meaning of the eigenvalues returned byeigenvalues(dm)
.Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: